[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: irradiated mail
My understanding is that virtually all of the dose from gamma irradiation is
produced by the secondary electrons. In that case, how would gamma irradiation
produce different effects than beta or electron beam irradiation?
The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.
Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com
Muckerheide wrote:
> Jim,
>
> As noted, e-beams, not gammas. E-beams are "politically-correct" vs.
> radioisotopes/radioactivity.
>
> Another fool's errand pushed by ignorance by "authorities" and "marketing"
> playing on anti-radiation perceptions.
>
> Regards, Jim
>
> on 8/28/02 6:00 PM, Jim Hardeman at Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us wrote:
>
> > Ruth -
> >
> > Based on what I saw about the "irradiation machines", I think you're probably
> > looking at electron beams rather than gamma or X-rays. I would suspect the
> > reaction of electrons w/ the organic sulfides would be similar to that of
> > alphas.
> >
> > I've heard stories (that's the best I can characterize them) of the clear
> > plastic windows on irradiated envelopes being browned / charred, other
> > plastics (floppy disks, CD's, etc.) being "melted" or deformed. To my mind the
> > chemical reactions in irradiated plastics are as likely, if not more likely,
> > to be responsible for the production of "irritants" as the irradiation of
> > paper ... assuming for the sake of argument, of course, that some sort of
> > irritants are actually produced by the irradiation process.
> >
> > For what it's worth, when I was working on the Radiation Sterilizers, Inc.
> > (RSI) cleanup here in Decatur, GA seemingly a lifetime ago (it was only 1988),
> > we were working with paper products, predominantly cardboard boxes, that had
> > been sterilized with gamma doses in the megarad range ... and we handled those
> > products with no ill effects. Now granted, we were surveying them for
> > contamination, so we did have latex gloves, etc. ... so that may not be a
> > valid data point ... but in the thousands of person-hours that we worked with
> > these products, I don't recall anybody saying anything about any sort of
> > irritant.
> >
> > My $0.02 worth ...
> >
> > Jim Hardeman
> > Jim_Hardeman@dnr.state.ga.us
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/