[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
NY Times on breast cancer rates
Radsafers,
While not directly related to rad safety, this NY Times analysis of breast
cancer rates and the Long Island Breast Cancer Study does an excellent job
of showing how elected officials and activist groups can seize on a myth and
perpetuate it.
Peter A. Genzer
Principal Media & Communications Specialist
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Phone: 631 344-3174
Fax: 631 344-3368
E-mail: genzer@bnl.gov
Web: www.bnl.gov
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/29/nyregion/29CANC.html
August 29, 2002
On Long Island, Scientists Keep Studying Breast Cancer Rates That Are Not
Unusual
By GINA KOLATA
When scientists announced this month that a widely anticipated federal study
of breast cancer had failed to find links to pollution or other
environmental factors, attention was again focused on the prevalence of the
disease on Long Island, where the study was based.
For years, it has been widely thought that rates of breast cancer on Long
Island are unusually high. But, contrary to popular belief, they are not.
The rates on Long Island are not much different from those of the rest of
the country - and a number of areas in the Northeast and elsewhere have
higher rates.
But the perception of an epidemic has persisted like a suburban legend.
Figures that scientists say have no basis in fact, like a breast cancer rate
that is 30 percent higher than the national average, have been bandied about
at public meetings, and repeated by breast cancer patients, politicians and
newspapers, including The New York Times.
Some news organizations have attributed the figure to the New York State
Department of Health, but a spokeswoman for the department, Kristine A.
Smith, said that the rates on Long Island were never that high and she did
not know where the figure came from.
Dr. Deborah Winn, head of the extramural epidemiology program at the
National Cancer Institute, said: "I don't think it is reflective of any
reality. I don't know where it comes from. It's myths."
It was fears of such an epidemic, and the political uproar that ensued, that
led Congress in 1993 to authorize the nearly $30 million study that has, so
far, failed to find evidence that pollutants are linked to the cancer.
The breast cancer incidence in Suffolk County, in the years 1994 to 1998,
was 118.2 cases per 100,000 women per year and in Nassau County it was
115.6, according to the State Health Department. The rate in the United
States was 114.3 cases per 100,000 women, the National Cancer Institute
said. That means that the breast cancer incidence in Suffolk County was 3.4
percent above the national average, and in Nassau County it was 1.1 percent
higher than the national average.
The lead investigator on the study, Dr. Marilie D. Gammon, an epidemiologist
at the University of North Carolina's School of Public Health, said she
never alluded to a Long Island breast cancer epidemic in applying for the
grant. Writing in her 1994 application, she said that the Long Island rates
from 1987 until 1989 were "generally comparable to the SEER rates,"
referring to national rates reported by the National Cancer Institute in its
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. That pattern continues,
with rates that are slightly higher than the national average but typical
for the Northeast.
But that was not the perception of many who who lobbied for the study. Geri
Barish, the president of 1 in 9: The Long Island Breast Cancer Action
Coalition, recalled her first news conference in 1991: "I said, `I have just
come from the Breast Cancer Capital of the World, and that is Long Island.'
"
Barbara Balaban, one of the leaders of the Long Island advocates for the
study, said she and others pushed for it because of what they had noticed on
Long Island. It seemed to them that an extraordinary number of their
neighbors, friends and relatives living in Nassau and Suffolk Counties had
gotten the disease.
"We didn't know as much then," she said. "We were only aware of what was
happening in our neighborhoods. That is an observation, not necessarily a
scientific description."
That observation led the women to action. "When we started, it was great
that people were talking about a really high incidence. That did catch
peoples' attention and fan the flames," Ms. Balaban said. "We went to
legislators and made a big issue out of it. We thought maybe it was
something in the environment."
But the advocates know that misinformation persists. Ms. Balaban says that
when she hears the 30 percent figure, she tries to correct it. "Whenever it
comes up in discussion, we say, `Listen, that is not what is going on,' "
Ms. Balaban said.
In response to the lobbying, Congress enacted Public Law 103-43 mandating
the study. It was to focus on Nassau and Suffolk Counties and two other
counties that had higher incidence rates than the New York State average,
Tolland County in Connecticut and Schoharie County in New York.
But sparsely populated Schoharie County's rate fluctuated markedly,
apparently by chance. Soon after the study began it was among the lowest in
the state. But the law was the law, and researchers kept studying it.
Ms. Balaban said that she and other advocates were not thinking about breast
cancer rates across the nation when they lobbied for the study. The data
they cited, she said, showed that there was more breast caner among women
living on Long Island than in the rest of the state.
Dr. Gammon said that the New York State rate was 104.1 cases per 100,000
women. In Nassau County, the figure was 11.0 percent higher than New York
State's, and in Suffolk County it was 13.5 percent higher.
She said that no one can say for sure why the disparity exists but there are
some possible explanations. Nassau and Suffolk Counties are relatively
affluent and women there, over all, have more mammograms than women in the
rest of the state. In other affluent areas, breast cancer rates are even
higher, Dr. Gammon said, citing as an example Bergen County, N.J., where the
breast cancer rate is 121.4 per 100,000. She said the entire northeast
corridor has relatively high rates, compared to the rest of the country.
Dr. Gammon said less affluent women are more likely to have children early
and to have many children, factors that decrease breast cancer risk. They
also are less likely to have mammograms.
Dr. Eric Feuer, a statistician at the National Cancer Institute said that
mammography finds some cancers that, left alone, would never have caused
symptoms. "When mammography rates go up, incidence goes up," he said.
So is the Long Island study, which continues, a mistake, based on a false
premise? "You're not going to get me to answer that question," Dr. Winn
said.
But Dr. Michael B. Bracken, a professor of epidemiology and public health at
Yale University, says the study should never have begun. "It is an example
of politicians jumping on the bandwagon and responding to the fears of their
local population without really thinking through what is going on in
science," he said. Such a study, he added, "is not so much science as a
political response."
The study's scientists, in the meantime, find themselves trying to appease
two masters, other researchers and breast cancer activists.
Dr. Gammon says she meets regularly with the advocates, explaining her view
as a scientist and listening to their concerns. She tells them, she said,
"that I think it's biologically plausible that there could be an
environmental link to breast cancer and that we are continuing to pursue the
leads that we have gotten to date." For example, she said, she is asking if
there are genetic differences in how women respond to pollutants and, if so,
whether they are related to surviving breast cancer.
"Their perception is very different from the scientific perception," Dr.
Gammon said of the Long Island women. "They live day to day with the fear
that's out there, and I live with the scientists, knowing that the majority
of scientists don't believe there is an environmental cause of breast
cancer."
She also takes calls, many calls, from the worried public. One, she said,
from a panicked woman, was typical. "She said, `I have to move to Long
Island. Where is it safe?' " It turned out that the woman was living in
Bergen County.
"I explained to her that where she lived had a higher rate of breast cancer
than where she was moving to," Dr. Gammon said. "You could hear the silence
on the other end of the phone."
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/