RE: Calabrese and Baldwin on hormesis in sensitive populations

["Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>]

Which, you or the article?  If the hormesis effect is not uniform throughout

the population, how can you say it is beneficial?



-- John 

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist 

3050 Traymore Lane

Bowie, MD  20715-2024



E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)      



-----Original Message-----

From: Muckerheide [mailto:muckerheide@attbi.com]

Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:55 PM

To: Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS); radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re: Calabrese and Baldwin on hormesis in sensitive populations





on 10/3/02 10:45 AM, Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS) at jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov

wrote:



> So, what this says is that since some individuals do not display a

low-dose

> stimulatory response, we need to take this into consideration when

> developing regulations.  Are you suggesting that regulations should

protect

> the most sensitive individuals?  Aren't our regulations restrictive enough

> for you?



Misread it again!? :-)

. . .

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/