[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Demise of UNSCEAR?
I don't know how Bill's experience leads him to the conclusion "that an
effective ALARA program also promotes good work practices, more efficient
utilization of resources, and high quality work." Maybe through good
maintenance training and planning Bill and others achieve these worthy
objectives.
On the other hand, wearing anticontamination clothing frequently leads to
unsafe situations and diminished ability to perform quality work. Need I
cite examples?
Mark Hogue
mark.hogue@srs.gov
"But we surely overrate the usefulness of what we like to call
"stimulation" and underrate the need for time, peace of mind, mature
reflection." - Susan Haack
"DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily
represent Westinghouse Savannah River Co. or the United States Department
of Energy."
William V Lipton
<liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM To: Jerry Cohen <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>
> cc: "Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)"
Sent by: <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>, "'RadSafe'"
owner-radsafe@list.van <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
derbilt.edu Subject: Re: Demise of UNSCEAR?
10/03/02 03:23 PM
Please respond to
William V Lipton
Jerry Cohen wrote:
...
On the contrary, ALARA doesn't really improve safety
performance. More likely, it causes the squandering of limited
resources toward solving non-problems; resources that could be
beneficially applied elsewhere.
I used to believe that myth, which is generally broadcast by those who have
limited practical experience.
On the contrary, experience at nuclear power plants generally shows that an
effective ALARA program also promotes good work practices, more efficient
utilization of resources, and high quality work.
The two major aspects of an ALARA program are:
1. ALARA for collective dose - A program for managing collective dose also
promotes:
a. work planning - The attention to detail required to perform a job with
ALARA also results in more efficient work practices.
b. training - dry runs on mock ups results in more efficient work and
fewer errors.
c. lessons learned - Jobs must be reviewed and lessons learned
incorporated into planning for future work. This also reduces errors and
results in more efficient work.
d. job scheduling - The optimum frequency must be determined for high dose
jobs, to avoid underscheduling, with resulting breakdowns, and
overscheduling, which generates unnecessary dose.
2. even distribution of dose within work groups - This promotes the more
efficient utilization of the work force. Management no longer has the
luxury of letting a few workers carry the load and ignoring nonperformers.
In fact, the lessons learned from ALARA programs are being used to promote
improved work practices in the non-nuclear side of utilities.
The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.
Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/