[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NY Times - nuke guards swamped by overtime
Norm;
I've been fairly quite so far, and I value your perspective. But you have
GOT to be kidding me on this one.
How can you possibly believe that Federalizing nuke plant guards will
improve professionalism? What is the federal government's well-spring for
this wonderful "professionalism", and how can I buy some?
I cannot think of a single federal agency that does ANYTHING better than
private industry can (I might accept the military, being x-Navy myself, but
one might imagine what alot of cash and little overhead might
accomplish...). I have worked at several nuke plants, and the guards that I
encountered were quite good.
Last of all, what does working alot of overtime have to do with
professionalism anyhow?
Overtime is part of the (generally) self-regulating business cycle. When
guards don't want to work so much overtime, they will quit. When the plants
can't keep enough guards happy, they will have to ask WHY? When they realize
that the overtime is causing the turnover in guards, they will have to
address the problem and hire more guards (working less hours) to keep
everyone happy. This cycle occurs naturally, and on a regular basis.
I respectfully disagree on this one. (& my private rambling, of course)
Regards,
-----------------------------------------------------------
Harry Anagnostopoulos, CHP
Senior Health Physicist
SAIC
9921 St. Charles Rock Rd.
St. Ann, MO 36074
(314) 429-9340 x22
-----Original Message-----
From: Norman Cohen [mailto:ncohen12@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:11 PM
To: Jack_Earley@RL.GOV
Cc: Michael.Kent@nmcco.com; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: NY Times - nuke guards swamped by overtime
GUys,
All the NY times article does is to raise a concern about too much overtime
for
nuke guards. This is one of the reasons why
we (unplug) supports Federalizing nuke plant guards, to bring a better level
of
professionalism to this important job, especially in the post-911 climate we
all
find ourselves in.
Norm
Jack_Earley@RL.GOV wrote:
> Many of us on this project worked 12 hours per day or more, often six days
a
> week instead of five, for the first six or seven months of this year, and
> we're now working 52 hours per week minimum. I don't recall anyone "losing
> it" or becoming "basket cases." We've had peop
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/