Re: So, you think you have problems with radioactive sources?

[Muckerheide <muckerheide@attbi.com>]

on 11/12/02 3:33 PM, Jerry Cohen at jjcohen@prodigy.net wrote:



> 

> ----- > > 

>>>> Actually, a careful reading of the above is that the losses are based on

>>>> people's fears, not the actual effects of the radiation. Interesting.

>>>> Irresponsible?

>>>> 

>>>> Comments?

>> 

>> <snip> 

>>> We may, literally, have a billion dollar clean-up effort, based on a

>>> regulatory limit, but with no legitimate health and safety concern.

>>> That makes no sense.

>>> 

>>> Barbara

>> 

>> Hi Barbara,

>> 

>> Of course it does. Where's the $ billion? Follow the money!

>> 

>> As Ted Rockwell says, "The money doesn't go down some rat hole, it goes into

>> some rat's pocket." :-)

>> 

>> Thanks.

>> Regards, Jim

>> ============

>> "It's about dose; its about truth about dose effects!

>> All else is semantics."

> 

> And, the rats get to boast about how they are saving the environment and

> people's health by upholding the regulations. Where else do crooks get to be

> considered public spirited citizens?



Sicily?



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/