[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
49 CFR/ICAO/IATA Training
The sentence in the 1997 interpretation is misleading when it says "the
shipper is not subject to the carrier training requirements." I have not
gone back to the 1997 ICAO and IATA regulations, but the current ICAO/IATA
regulations explicitly state their training sections apply to shippers.
Albeit this still does distract from the fact that the 2 year period
specified in ICAO and IATA is not applicable, as stated below by Bill Lipton
and in my earlier e-mail reply.
Roy A. Parker, Ph.D.
roy@royparker.org
Tel: 225-924-1473
Fax: 225-924-4269
----- Original Message -----
From: "William V Lipton" <liptonw@dteenergy.com>
To: "William G. Nabor" <wgnabor@uci.edu>
Cc: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:55 PM
Subject: Re:
>
> You do NOT need training every 2 years. There is a DOT letter of
> interpretation available on the hazmat safety home page. Look for the
> interpretations for 49 CFR 172.702. It's a letter to John Nipper, dated
May 6,
> 1997. It states:
>
> "A shipper who uses the ICAO Technical Instructions for the transport of
> hazardous materials, domestically or internationally, must be re-trained
at
> least once every three years in accordance with paragraph 172.704(c).
Although
> a shipper offers hazardous materials in accordance with the ICAO Technical
> Instuctions, as provided in paragraph 171.11, the shipper is not subject
to the
> carrier training requirements of the ICAO Technical Instructions."
>
> The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
> It's not about dose, it's about trust.
> Curies forever.
>
> Bill Lipton
> liptonw@dteenergy.com
>
> "William G. Nabor" wrote:
>
> > Dear Radsafers:
> >
> > The U.S. DOT regulations require shippers of radioactive material to
be
> > retrained every 3 years. IATA says every 2 years. I have in my notes
from
> > Roy Parker's class that the U.S. adopted IATA, but cannot find chapter
and
> > verse. Dr. Parker, are you out there? I need to prove (by quoting some
> > regulation) that I need retraining every 2 years. No credit given for
> > deducing why this is needed. Or, if it's the case, why IATA's 2-year
> > requirement doesn't apply. Can anybody help? Thanks.
> > ---------------------
> > W. G. Nabor
> > Senior Health Physicist
> > University of CA, Irvine
> > WGNABOR@UCI.EDU
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
- References:
- No Subject
- From: "William G. Nabor" <wgnabor@uci.edu>
- Re:
- From: William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM>