[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Know_Nukes] Air pollution may alter genes
Come on, mutations are subtly occurring in every generation. Mutations are
natural and in most cases beneficial, its an adaptive response to an
environmental force. We, homo sapiens, are a result of mutation. As the
sun's radiant energy increases, some million years before it collapses,
there will be adaptive mutations here on earth to allow survival under the
higher radiation levels. These will take place over a long period of time
and during that period there will be many detrimental mutations that will
not survive. Eventually the evolutionary process will win out via mutation
to a viable species. (wow, I better lay off the coffee so late at
night.....)
H. Dean Chaney, CHP
URS Corp. Sacramento, CA
(916) 679-2086
"In science there is only physics; everything else is stamp collecting."
--Ernest Rutherford
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Dapra" <sjd@swcp.com>
To: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Know_Nukes] Air pollution may alter genes
> Jan. 9
>
> On Jan 7, I wrote, concerning genetic alterations as a result of air
> pollution: "If these findings are legitimate why aren't there already
> mutant children all over the place around steel mills?"
>
> On Jan. 9, John Jacobus replied: "I think that it should be considered
> that the gene mutations found are obviously not determental to the gull,
> mice, or humans. If it was, the effects should have been reported if
> observed. Just because a gene mutation occurs should not lead to the
> assumption that it will lead to extra limbs, increased cancers etc. If I
> remember correctly, studies around Chernobyl found mutations in voles.
> Yet, the animal population flourished."
>
> Thank you, John, for making this salient point. My fallback position
> would be, are there any studies showing increased rates of mutations in
> children who were raised near steel mills? This is more of a rhetorical
> question, although I would guess that the answer would be 'no'. If
studies
> had been done showing increased mutations I am certain David Suzuki and
his
> foundation and like-minded parties would have ballyhooed the studies all
> over the place.
>
> I sent the Suzuki Foundation an e-mail asking where the mutation study had
> been published, but so far have not received a reply.
>
> I just visited the ENN website where the mutation article was published.
> According to a posting from an anonymous participant on the ENN discussion
> forum pursuant to the article, Dr. Suziki never provides references or
> citations. Since he is hiding behind "anonymous," I can't contact him.
> Two or three other participants have also requested a citation.
>
> Steven Dapra
> sjd@swcp.com
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/