RadSafe Archive Mail Index January, 2003

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Article: Colleges returning to nuclear s (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• mail trouble- returning to 11e2 discussi (0) Tristan
  
• Looking for Radiation Related Pictures (0) Arsnews
  
• BWCHPS CHP Course Announcement (0) JOHN JACOBUS
  
• NCRP is seeking an Executive Director (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: Three Mile Island intruder(?) (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Apparent anti-correlations between geogr (2) Strom, Daniel J
  
• tmi intrusion (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Three Mile Island intruder(?) (0) Steve Frantz
  
• More on FAS (0) Rad Safety Institute
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (1) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• RE: More on FAS (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (3) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (2) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (1) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Brian Rees
  
• Re: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Help with locating a Victoreen Thyac (Mo (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Larson, Kaye M BAMC-Ft Sam Houston
  
• RE: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (1) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Not using LNT to calculate risk doe (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Glow_Worm
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• APHYS-2003 International Conference (0) Secretariat
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Please give an appropriate subject in yo (0) John Cameron
  
• Lithuania wants new N-plant to replace I (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) M Nivas
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Tony Harrison
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• "Temelin increases capacity as Austrians (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Portable Swipe Counters (0) Cehn
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Norm's New Year Resolution may come true (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Three Mile Island intruder(?) (0) Shaw, Roger P.
  
• AW: "Temelin increases capacity as Austr (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Philippe Duport
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (1) Mitchell Davis
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Hypotheses, Theories and LNT (0) mark.hogue
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Hypotheses, Theories and LNT (0) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (2) Norman Cohen
  
• NY worlds fair irradiated dime (0) Peter Sandgren
  
• report questions NRC decisions on Davis (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: report questions NRC decisions on Da (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Asst. RSO Position (0) Khelm924
  
• " Sweden approves MOX use " [FW] (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Depleted uranium article in Wall St. Jnl (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) Vincent King
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Brochure (2) H. Burcin OKYAR
  
• Re: Brochure (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: Brochure (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Norm's New Year Resolution may come (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (2) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• RE: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False (1) Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)
  
• world's fair irradiated dimes (0) Peter Sandgren
  
• HPS International Relations Committee Po (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Its End Near, Galileo Takes NASA on Wild (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Costs?... Was Re:parent anti-correlation (0) Chanin, David Ian
  
• Disaster Preparedness (1) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• Emergency Preparedness (1) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• AW: Emergency Preparedness (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• New: Accident v. terrorist attack (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Emergency Preparedness (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Brochure (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• Re: Disaster Preparedness (0) Gary Mansfield
  
• Job opportunities on the Yucca Mountain (0) Bill_Carl
  
• Re: AW: Emergency Preparedness (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Re:Accidental Deaths from various method (0) Jean-Pierre Degrange
  
• " Anti-Temelin hunger strike to activate (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False (2) hflong
  
• Correction! Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Re (1) hflong
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (2) hflong
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) hflong
  
• Copy of NUREG-1501 on Background Radiati (1) Leo M. Lowe
  
• RE: " Anti-Temelin hunger strike to acti (0) Neil, David M
  
• NRC Document (1) Dan Hoffman
  
• Thank you - Copy of NUREG-1501 on Backgr (0) Leo M. Lowe
  
• Air pollution may alter genes (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: NRC Document (1) Bruce Bugg
  
• Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Correction! Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, an (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Air pollution may alter genes (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Copy of NUREG-1501 on Background Rad (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: NRC Document (0) John Jacobus
  
• Looking For Good Books (3) Naamah
  
• 2003 Recommendations of the European Com (0) Yarmoshenko IV
  
• RE: Emergency Preparedness (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• RE: Looking For Good Books (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Looking For Good Books (0) Jim Otton
  
• NEUTRON THERAPY PROCEDURE ON EXPLANTED H (0) SusanAhmed
  
• Re: Looking For Good Books (0) John Johnson
  
• position vacancy (0) Roger.Moroney
  
• RE: Looking For Good Books (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Source - Hormesis at 3 rem/year expe (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: hospital contamination incident (1) Perrero, Daren
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Looking For Good Books (environmenta (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (1) BLHamrick
  
• Today I submitted a letter to the editor (1) John Cameron
  
• Re: Today I submitted a letter to the ed (0) John Jacobus
  
• Confusion on data in the NSWS final repo (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Air pollution may alter (0) John Jacobus
  
• IPM8 personnel contamination monitors (0) Susan Wynne
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Looking For Good Books (environmenta (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (2) William V Lipton
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (2) Michael G. Stabin
  
• AW: hospital contamination incident (0) Van Dorp Frederik (vdf)
  
• RSPA Lowers hazmat registration fees (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (1) William Prestwich
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (0) William V Lipton
  
• Job Opportunities - Internal Dosimetry (0) OFFTOWY
  
• CHP Prep Course (1) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• Re: CHP Prep Course (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: [Know_Nukes] Air pollution may alter (0) Wright, Will (DHS-PSB)
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's Pol (1) Stewart Farber
  
• Dosimeters and airport security (2) Tom Morgan
  
• Shipyard Exposures (0) epirad
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Other CHP courses (0) Gibbons, Gregory J
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (2) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (0) JGinniver
  
• Dosimeters and Airport Security (0) Flood, John
  
• manufacture and supply of radioactive so (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Looking For Good Books (environmenta (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Fwd: Re: Dosimeters and airport security (0) Judith M. Clark
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (1) Sandy Perle
  
• 22nd Annual International Dosimetry Symp (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (1) Doug Aitken
  
• The value(?) of the Nuclear Shipyard Wo (3) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Radiation Technician-Albuquerque (0) ERGKBAKER
  
• RE: Dosimeters and airport security (0) Stanford Dosimetry
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: The value(?) of the Nuclear Shipyar (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (1) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Web question: Should NPP Barseback 2 be (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: The value(?) of the Nuclear Shipyar (2) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Air pollution may alter (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: The value(?) of the Nuclear Shipyar (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Air pollution may alter (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (1) Mitchell Davis
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (1) Mitchell Davis
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Looking For Good Books (environmenta (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• APHYS-2003 International Meeting: Review (0) Secretariat
  
• Re: The value(?) of the Nuclear Shipyar (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (1) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Tight genes make radiation-munching bug (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's Pol (2) epirad
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (2) John Jacobus
  
• RE: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (2) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (1) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Doug Aitken
  
• AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's Pol (0) epirad
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Looking For Good Books (environmenta (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: hospital contamination incident (0) John Jacobus
  
• " Circling the DNA wagons against radiat (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• AW: Web question: Should NPP Barseback 2 (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Nev. Files Challenge on Nuclear Waste (0) Sandy Perle
  
• NRC Chairman Rejects Ohio Plant Criticis (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) John Johnson
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) John Johnson
  
• March 2003 Health Physics Journal (0) BABusby
  
• Re: Nev. Files Challenge on Nuclear Wast (1) BobCherry
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: your questions about the SMRs of the (0) John Cameron
  
• A reply to Dan Strom's comments on the N (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security (1) JGinniver
  
• Re: Dosimeters and Airport Security (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) damm01
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Rad Safety Institute
  
• Re: Nev. Files Challenge on Nuclear Wast (0) Rad Safety Institute
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (2) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) GWilton
  
• RE: The value(?) of the Nuclear Shipyar (0) Neil, David M
  
• Greenpeace breaks into Sizewell B nuclea (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Dosimeters and Airport Security (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Tight genes make radiation-munching (1) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Regarding statement on AARST and Mr. (0) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Dosimeters and airport security (1) Stanford Dosimetry
  
• RE: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Tight genes make radiation-munching (0) John Johnson
  
• Re: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Dosimetry and Exposure from carry-on X-r (1) radcon
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (0) Glenn marshall
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Semantics and nit-picking [was:Re: Appar (1) Doug Aitken
  
• RE: AARST Radon Scientist Claim Nation's (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Dosimetry and Exposure from carry-on (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Dosimetry and Exposure from carry-on (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Semantics and nit-picking [was:Re: A (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• pictures of dosimeters - 1945 - 55 era (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (2) Rob Gunter
  
• Re: Apparent anti-correlations between g (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• MidYear HPS - Looking for Lowell Alums (0) William A. Lorenzen
  
• " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a ter (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (0) Elaine Marshall
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a (0) maury
  
• RE: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (2) Rob Gunter
  
• RE: " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Fwd: NIH FS re: Nasopharyngeal Radium Ir (1) John Jacobus
  
• Geographical distribution of gamma radia (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (0) William V Lipton
  
• Is ALARA unconstitutional (in Canada)? (0) Cabeza, Luis (MOL)
  
• RE: NIH FS re: Nasopharyngeal Radium Irr (0) Scott, Bob A
  
• Michigan Section, ANS Meeting (0) William V Lipton
  
• Geographical distribution of gamma radia (1) epirad
  
• RE: " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a (0) Kent, Michael D.
  
• HP Position Open (0) Matthew Rumick
  
• Re: Geographical distribution of gamma r (0) Fred_Haywood
  
• Russia shuts nuclear plant over leak fea (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Geographical distribution of gamma r (2) Jim Otton
  
• Thanks: Re: Geographical distribution of (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: NIH FS re: Nasopharyngeal Radium Irr (1) Rad Safety Institute
  
• Re: NIH FS re: Nasopharyngeal Radium Irr (1) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Dosimeters and airport security - Re (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Another confounding factor for life-span (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Geographical distribution of gamma r (0) Jim Otton
  
• Just an amusing thing (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Manual for Eberline MS-2 (0) William A. Lorenzen
  
• RE: Geographical distribution of gamma r (1) Michael McNaughton
  
• NRC to change regulation of nuclear powe (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• British ricin raid death and security (0) M Nivas
  
• RE: Geographical distribution of gamma r (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• HP Technician Position -- Denver, CO (0) Dan Hoffman
  
• Fwd: British ricin raid death and securi (0) JGinniver
  
• EXACT specification of laser symbol (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Palo Verde Sets National Production Reco (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Radon Deaths (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• SR RCTs Needed for Portsmouth, OH (0) Stephanie Long
  
• RE: " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: " Jane's nuclear expert on carnage a (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Belgian lawmakers agree to shut down nuc (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Ronald Paul (1) William V Lipton
  
• IH Technician-Nevada (0) rdgauny
  
• RE: Ronald Paul (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Re: Ronald Paul (0) BLHamrick
  
• Transportation regulation changes (0) Fritz Strydom
  
• RE: Geographical distribution of gamma r (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• INTERVIEW-Germany's nuclear exit a mista (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Pu pipe removal question (0) Dave Biela
  
• RE: Geographical distribution of gamma r (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Call for Papers Applied Physics 2003 (0) Secretariat
  
• Study Details Steps To Reduce Dirty Bomb (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Study Details Steps To Reduce Dirty (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• RE: Study Details Steps To Reduce Dirty (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• Non-CHPs in the health physics job marke (2) Toli Mikell
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) KDA2921
  
• Use detector physical area, not effectiv (0) Steve Frantz
  
• Re: Use detector physical area, not effe (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Sr-90 Ingestion dose conversion factor - (0) kc10100
  
• Re: NIH FS re: Nasopharyngeal Radium Irr (0) willim01
  
• Open Position (0) Rima, Steve
  
• [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (1) hflong
  
• re:Pu pipe removal question (0) Brian Keele
  
• Field Supervisor position available - NY (0) Stephanie Long
  
• First unit of troubled Temelin nuclear p (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Surface Contaminated Objects and release (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Decommissioned Sites (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: Use detector physical area, not effe (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Worker hurt as uranium container explode (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) William V Lipton
  
• Immediate Opening - Health Physicist (0) Greg Johnson
  
• Multiple Dosimetry Dose Assignment (1) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Rough weather in outer space can wreak h (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Multiple Dosimetry Dose Assignment (0) Sandy Perle
  
• New Master of Health Physics Program (0) Eli Port
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (0) John Jacobus
  
• Reply to SCO wiping efficiency question (0) Morris, Robert
  
• Re: Worker hurt as uranium container exp (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Worker hurt as uranium container exp (0) Rogers Brent
  
• Re: Power Plant was declared bankrupt. (0) Emil
  
• Virtual Chat and Presentation on Dirty B (0) Susan McElrath
  
• RE: Power Plant was declared bankrupt. (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Acceptable Confidence in Survey (0) MILLERWF
  
• Feedback: Preparing for hazardous duty . (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• AW: Power Plant was declared bankrupt. (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Old EPA Report on Radon Standard for U T (0) Leo M. Lowe
  
• Re: AW: Power Plant was declared bankrup (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (4) John Jacobus
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (1) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Multiple Dosimetry Dose Assignment (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• uncertainty principle is untenable (0) sabill
  
• RE: Surface Contaminated Objects and rel (1) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (0) William Prestwich
  
• RE: Surface Contaminated Objects and rel (1) Wes Van Pelt
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (0) John Johnson
  
• need for HPs (1) JOHN.RICH
  
• Re: Surface Contaminated Objects and rel (1) William V Lipton
  
• Cs-137 sources...will donate (0) Bruce Bristow
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] and K-40 (0) Paul_Prichard
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (1) Rob Gunter
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (1) hflong
  
• Re: need for HPs (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Use detector physical area, not effe (1) Steve Frantz
  
• Re: need for HPs (0) Alfonso
  
• Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (0) hflong
  
• Re: Use detector physical area, not effe (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (2) Mitchell Davis
  
• Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Skin D (1) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Monty Charles
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (2) E.P. Goldfinch
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (3) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• RE: [Fwd: CURE for Rad Fear] (0) Stewart Smith
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) glandry
  
• RE: Surface Contaminated Objects and rel (0) Wesley
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Monty Charles
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (2) Glenn marshall
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (1) KDA2921
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Sandy Perle
  
• The Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) (1) Kent, Michael D.
  
• SR RCTs needed for Los Alamos (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Re: The Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Science Fair - So. Cal. (0) Cehn
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (1) john grant
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (1) William V Lipton
  
• Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Skin D (3) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) joseroze@netvision.net.il
  
• Other routes to an expanded mind (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Somerville, Mark
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (1) Joseph Heckman
  
• Davis Besse Nuclear Power Plant on PBS T (0) Bob
  
• PBS Program on Davis-Besse Tonight (0) Sewell, Linda
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Vincent King
  
• Non-degreed CHPs? (0) Les Aldrich
  
• China wants to join int'l thermonuclear (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Philip Egidi
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) john grant
  
• Re: need for HPs (1) BLHamrick
  
• CHP -swear by it or swear at it? (1) Toli Mikell
  
• HP government work (0) Walter cofer
  
• Re: need for HPs (0) Dean Chaney
  
• Re: Weighting Factor for Hot Particle Sk (0) Dean Chaney
  
• Re: CHP -swear by it or swear at it? (0) John Johnson
  
• More media coverage of the EPRI report.. (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: HP government work (1) BLHamrick
  
• RE: HP government work (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: HP government work (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) mark.hogue
  
• USA Today chat 1/27 1:30PM - John Poston (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Marthaller, Chris
  
• A book review of KZ Morgans "autobiograp (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) mark.hogue
  
• " Alberta facility reports loss of radio (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• job opening (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) Mitchell Davis
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (1) Armstrong, Jason A
  
• RE: Non-CHPs in the health physics job m (0) gaxt
  
• Fwd: Dosimetry Report AD C005972 (0) wharris
  
• send your e-mail on food irradiation to (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Recommendations for Software/Code for Ra (1) Youngblood, Thomas H Jr.
  
• CALL FOR PAPERS: APHYS-2003 Conference (0) Secretariat
  
• Dosimeter response to LK fields in HPS N (0) Stanford Dosimetry
  
• RE: Recommendations for Software/Code fo (0) Wesley
  
• reply from Health Canada on my e-mail on (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• FWD/CRSO Meeting Invitation and Call for (0) Ninni Jacob
  
• Operational Radiation Safety (0) Charles Parr
  
• Japanese Rad Safety (0) James Reese
  
• Re: Howard Long (0) hflong
  
• Re: Computer Codes.... (0) JPreisig
  
• Re: Japanese Rad Safety (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• " Alberta mulls nuclear plants to power (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: A book review of KZ Morgans "autobio (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• (Positive) Health Physics Exposure on TV (0) Sharyn Mathews
  
• Moe Handbook (0) Jason Hunt
  
• Re: " Alberta mulls nuclear plants to po (0) Todd Brautigam
  
• Re: Moe Handbook (1) mark.hogue
  
• Re: Moe Handbook (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Moe Handbook (0) Clayton, Christopher
  
• GM response to neutrons? (2) Kai Kaletsch
  
• The Question of Irradiated Beef in Lunch (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: GM response to neutrons? (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: The Question of Irradiated Beef in L (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: GM response to neutrons? (1) Phil Hypes
  
• Re: GM response to neutrons? (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: GM response to neutrons? (1) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: AW: The Question of Irradiated Beef (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• AW: GM response to neutrons? (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: GM response to neutrons? (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Moe: Operational Safety Handbook (0) Kenneth Lamson
  
• Re: GM response to neutrons? (0) NSSIHOU
  
• Re: AW: GM response to neutrons? (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: GM response to neutrons? (1) John Andrews
  
• Re: AW: GM response to neutrons? (0) Doug Aitken
  
• APHYS-2003 Conference organization (0) Secretariat
  
• RE: GM response to neutrons?[Scanned] (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Article: SRS clears nuclear waste (F Can (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• ANL-88-26 (0) Fred McWilliams
  
• Three dead after N.C. blast (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Transportation Question (0) Randall_F_Brich
  
• Re: GM response to neutrons? (0) Ted de Castro
  
• NRC Event Report (0) William V Lipton
  
• SR RCTs Needed (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (3) Peter Bossew
  
• Re: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (0) Sandy Perle
  
• References on Observational Approach to (0) Armstrong, Jason A
  
• Radioactive film (0) Mercado, Don
  
• U.S. to rejoin international fusion proj (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Feedback - Radioactive iodine leak conta (0) J. J. Rozental
  
• Feedback - What if a dirty bomb hit Lond (1) J. J. Rozental
  
• RE: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (1) Strickert, Rick
  
• Article: Lightning emits X-Rays (1) Timm, Jason
  
• Re: NRC Event Report (0) Glenn marshall
  
• Job Posting (0) Jim Casto
  
• Dosimeters with low activity neutron sou (2) Rob Gunter
  
• Operational Radiation Safety (0) John M Priest Jr
  
• Re: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (1) maury
  
• Re: Dosimeters with low activity neutron (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Job Posting (2) Fleming, Kenneth N.
  
• RE: Article: Lightning emits X-Rays (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Job Posting (1) Hart, Tim P GS (RASO)
  
• Japan's govt appeals against fast-breede (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Article: Lightning emits X-Rays (0) William Prestwich
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) damm01
  
• RE: Job Posting (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Need help finding coeficient (0) St�phane Pilotte
  
• Re: Job Posting (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Article: Lightning emits X-Rays (0) maury
  
• RE: Job Posting (1) Abelquist, Eric
  
• RE: Job Posting (2) Sandy Perle
  
• Dogma, anti-nukes,and the nuclear "debat (0) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Job Posting (0) Glenn marshall
  
• RE: Job Posting (0) Richard Gallego
  
• RE: Job Posting (0) John Campbell
  
• Re(2): Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (1) Peter Bossew
  
• Re: Use of nuc. weapons in Iraq (0) maury
  
• Re: Dogma, anti-nukes,and the nuclear "d (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Job Posting (0) Somerville, Mark
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Greens to issue radiation risk study (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: Feedback - Radioactive iodine leak c (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Job Posting (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: Feedback - What if a dirty bomb hit (0) Rad Safety Institute