----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:23
PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad
Fear]
Howard,
My point is if you make external measurements, and then someone says that
the risk is due to internal exposure, don't you think that the public will
doubt your knowledge and understanding of the risk? Do you think that
this will instill confidence in your message?
howard long <hlong@pacbell.net> wrote:
What is that level of risk, John?
I have never heard of a single case of
ingestion or inhalation Pu poisoning. Have you?
Has anyone on this List?
The good of measuring external exposure is
reassurance of these persons with fear of that non-existent danger and
mitigation of their obstruction to uses of radioactivity.
Howard Long
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:21
PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CURE for Rad
Fear]
Howard,
Since the risk from plutonium is from inhalation and ingestion, what
good is the meter that measures external exposure rates?
hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net
wrote:
This
should be of special interest to you.
. . .
My alpha-gamma-x
counter measured just 0.0002 mrad/minute in the
Livermore Council
Chambers.
-- John
John
Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail
Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
now