[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Belgian lawmakers agree to shut down nuclear plants



Index:



Belgian lawmakers agree to shut down nuclear plants

Fire shuts AEP's Cook 1 nuke in Michigan

Hiroshima A-bomb found slightly more powerful than thought

Study Details Steps to Reduce Dirty Bomb Threat

--------------------------------------------------------------------



Belgian lawmakers agree to shut down nuclear plants



BRUSSELS, Jan 16 (Reuters) - Belgium committed itself to a nuclear-

free future on Thursday, passing a law to shut down the country's 

seven nuclear reactors by 2025.



The move is controversial because Belgium gets nearly 60 percent of 

its electricity from the reactors. The government will invest in 

solar, wind and other renewable energy resources as well as build 

more gas plants to compensate for the loss of nuclear power.



The bill follows a pledge by Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt when he 

took office three years ago and aims to eliminate the risk of a 

disastrous accident at one of the reactors and reduce the dangers of 

radioactive waste.



The decision by Belgium's upper house to approve the bill followed an 

earlier vote by the lower house in December.



The bill orders the shutting of the reactors after 40 years of use 

and bans the construction of new ones. The first reactors will be 

dismantled by February 2015, the last in 2025.

-----------------



Fire shuts AEP's Cook 1 nuke in Michigan



NEW YORK, Jan 16 (Reuters) - An overnight transformer fire has shut 

indefinitely the Cook 1 nuclear power plant in Bridgman, Michigan, 

plant operator American Electric Power Co. <AEP.N> said on Thursday.



The fire in the main transformer at the 1,095 megawatt unit, one of 

Michigan's biggest power plants, burned for 35 minutes before it was 

put out by plant personnel. One worker was treated for smoke 

inhalation, AEP said.



While the fire struck the non-nuclear part of the facility and posed 

no danger to the public, it nevertheless prompted AEP to declare an 

"unusual event," as required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission, the federal agency that oversees nuclear plant safety.



"Plant operators are investigating the situation," a Cook plant 

spokesman said, adding there was no immediate word on when the unit 

might resume generating electricity.



AEP, based in Columbus, Ohio, said they have a replacement 

transformer available at the plant, which means the repair work would 

likely take less time than if a new transformer had to be ordered and 

transported to the plant.



The fire did not affect the neighboring Cook 2 power plant, rated at 

1,090 megawatts, which continued to run at full power. Together, the 

two Cook reactors generate enough electricity to power about 2 

million homes.



The units are part of AEP's vast fleet of power plants, concentrated 

in the Midwest. The company's generating capacity totals about 42,000 

megawatts.

----------------



Hiroshima A-bomb found slightly more powerful than thought



HIROSHIMA, Jan. 16 (Kyodo) - The atomic bomb that was dropped on 

Hiroshima in 1945 was slightly more powerful than had been thought, 

according to a recent study by experts in Japan and the United 

States.



The ''yield'' of the bomb was actually equivalent to 16,000 tons of 

TNT explosive, a measure of force, rather than the previously thought 

15,000 tons, according to the experts who will be making a 

presentation on the subject at a meeting of Japanese and U.S. 

researchers in California from Tuesday.



One of them, Masaharu Hoshi, a physics professor of Hiroshima 

University, said Japanese and U.S. scholars last year revised the 

estimated altitude where the bomb exploded over the western Japan 

city to 600 meters from 580 meters.



They then came up with a new formula for computation that would wipe 

out discrepancies between estimates of radiation doses and actually 

reported doses, he said.



The U.S. scholars then proposed that it may be necessary to revise 

the amount of atomic fission, which measures the force of explosion, 

so that those estimates and the actual doses match.



The scholars from the two countries have since been working on this 

issue, Hoshi said.



He said that the latest revision of the yield is unlikely to result 

in changes to the estimated amount of radiation people were exposed 

to in Hiroshima.

-----------------



Study Details Steps to Reduce Dirty Bomb Threat



WASHINGTON, Jan. 16 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The Monterey Institute Center 

for Nonproliferation Studies (CNS) today released an assessment of 

the security risks posed by commercial radioactive sources, an 

important class of radioactive materials that might be used by 

terrorists to fabricate a "dirty bomb."



Until recently, the security of common radioactive sources in 

medicine, industry, and scientific research had not been perceived as 

a major security concern. But the expressed interest of al Qaeda and 

other terrorist groups in radiological dispersal devices (RDDs) has 

caused policymakers to seek new measures to ensure these materials do 

not fall into the wrong hands.



The report, part of an on-going CNS study on the "Faces of Nuclear 

Terrorism," concludes that the challenge of securing commercial 

radioactive sources around the world is difficult, but manageable.  

It provides practical recommendations to government and industry 

that, if implemented, could significantly reduce this component of 

the dirty bomb threat over the next five years.



"Commercial Radioactive Sources: Surveying the Security Risks," by 

Charles D. Ferguson, Tahseen Kazi and Judith Perera is available at 

http://www.cns.miis.edu. Dr. Ferguson is scientist-in-residence at 

the CNS Washington, D.C. office.  Among the report's major findings:



-- RDDs or "dirty bombs" are generally not weapons of mass 

destruction. Few, if any, people would die immediately after exposure 

to the ionizing radiation from an RDD.



-- Only a small fraction of the radioactive sources in use today pose 

inherently high security risks, and the great majority of these are 

under regulatory control in advanced countries.



-- The production of commercial radioactive sources is concentrated 

in a handful of countries and enterprises, creating regulatory 

opportunities to ensure adequate security in recipient states.



-- U.S. and Canadian export licensing rules, typical of suppliers, 

permit the export of most high-risk sources without any governmental 

review of the credentials of end-users. Pending new regulations, 

Canada has alerted exporters to verify the bona fides of end-users, 

but the U.S. has not.



The CNS report urges that several high priority actions be taken to 

combat the risks from commercial radioactive sources. These include:



-- Improving source controls by expanding programs to securely 

dispose of sources no longer in use ("disused sources") and by 

intensifying already active programs to track down and secure lost 

and discarded "orphan" sources, especially in the former Soviet 

Union.



-- Enhancing regulatory measures by assisting nations with weak 

source security rules and by improving export control measures, 

especially end-user checks.



-- Preparing now for RDD attacks.  Although risks from radioactive 

sources can be significantly reduced in coming years, the RDD threat 

will never be eliminated.  Through public education, training of 

first responders, and active planning exercises the impacts of a 

future RDD attack could be greatly mitigated.



-------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle

Director, Technical

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100  Extension 2306

Fax:(714) 668-3149



E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com



Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/