[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Correction! Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False Fears
- To: hflong@pacbell.net
- Subject: Correction! Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False Fears
- From: hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 09:49:47 -0800
- Cc: "Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>, "'howard long'" <hlong@pacbell.net>, Franz Schoenhofer <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>, "'Rad Safety Institute'" <radsafeinst@cableone.net>, RuthWeiner@AOL.COM, sjd@swcp.com, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
- References: <8B08CB90735BE243B6B7ED7CA0074C140672D372@nihexchange6.nih.gov><3E1B1114.E01A169A@postoffice.pacbell.net>
- Reply-To: hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net
- Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
CORRECTION
My proposed study would be of NOT "0.1-1.0 R/hr" but
"0.1 -1.0 millirad/hr from uranium ore under the mattress" or placebo
I apologize for the typo.
Howard Long
hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net wrote:
>
> John and others concerned with radiation benefit/harm,
>
> C reactive protein does surpass cholesterol as prognosticator of heart
> attack, stroke and death (recently flooding the media). It also has been
> related to clots in the very public Womens Health Initiative where
> women who took estrogen-progesterone had more clots vs placebo (but I
> believe non-smokers not, when data disclosed). In Crohn's Disease
> (terrible colitis) improvement also follows CRP decrease, and CRP
> appears to be a measure of inflammation, like a smoothing of fever
> readings. What do you think of CRP use as a quicker, more convenient
> measure to predict heart disease and death in a placebo study of 0.1 to
> 1.0 R/Hr from uranium ore under the mattress of persons with CRP>4
> mgm/L?
>
> I believe over-regulation of low dose radiation is increasing clots and
> cancer in areas with < 0.1 cGy/year, like most of the USA coast,
> considering the lesser rates in areas with higher background. This
> belief is suggested by the numerous animal and human studies on
> Muckerheide's list and set up by Luckey's book on Radiation Hormesis.
> The $100B for "clean-up" taken from the economy is a much more credible
> cause of deaths than Goffman's LNT extrapolations beyond the data of
> cancer deaths from LDRadiation.
>
> Best Wishes
> Howard Long
>
> "Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)" wrote:
> >
> > Howard,
> > If we are going to have clear discussions, you are going to stop assuming
> > the I, and others on this list, understand all of your comments. What do
> > you mean by "C reactive protein prognostic value = cholesterol) by
> > supplemental 0.5 to 5.0 rem/yr?" What diseases are the regulations
> > perpetuating?
> >
> > -- John
> >
> > John P. Jacobus, MS
> > Certified Health Physicist
> > e-mail: jenday1@msn.com
> >
> > The comments presented are mine and do not reflect the opinion of my
> > employer or spouse.
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: howard long [mailto:hlong@pacbell.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 12:45 AM
> > To: Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS); hflong@pacbell.net; Franz Schoenhofer
> > Cc: 'Rad Safety Institute'; RuthWeiner@AOL.COM; sjd@swcp.com;
> > radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> > Subject: Re: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False Fears
> >
> > John Jacobus and HPs who would protect from both excess and deficient
> > radiation.
> >
> > It is not "homeopathic" to prevent cancer and other disease (like myocardial
> > infarction, considering recent C reactive protein prognostic value =
> > cholesterol) by supplemental 0.5 to 5.0 rem/yr.
> >
> > We are having these discussions because regulators like yourself have been
> > expensively perpetuating deficiency disease. Excessive safety precautions
> > damage public health and welfare.
> > The "precautionary principle" favored by anti-nucs requires that regulators
> > stop depriving underprivileged areas of radiant energy associated with
> > better health.
> > . . .
> > Howard Long MD MPH
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>
> > To: <hflong@pacbell.net>; "Franz Schoenhofer" <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>
> > Cc: "'Rad Safety Institute'" <radsafeinst@cableone.net>; "howard long"
> > <hlong@pacbell.net>; <RuthWeiner@AOL.COM>; <sjd@swcp.com>;
> > <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 3:44 AM
> > Subject: RE: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False Fears
> >
> > > Howard,
> > > As you know, ionizing radiation is already used in medicine, for diagonsis
> > > and therapy. Whether it is a homeopathic drug is another still debatable.
> > > Otherwise, why would we be having these discussions?
> > >
> > > -- John
> > > John P. Jacobus, MS
> > > Certified Health Physicist
> > > e-mail: jenday1@msn.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net
> > > [mailto:hflong@postoffice.pacbell.net]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:25 PM
> > > To: Franz Schoenhofer
> > > Cc: Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS); 'Rad Safety Institute'; howard long;
> > > RuthWeiner@AOL.COM; sjd@swcp.com; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> > > Subject: Dirty bombs, LNT, and Removing False Fears
> > >
> > >
> > > Franz and HPs liberated from LNT,
> > > Authoritarianism, traditional for Europe but not the USA, can manage
> > > with LNT - but not with individual choice for ionizing radiation
> > > benefit/harm. The Nobel Prize for 2002 in Economics was awarded for
> > > showing individual choices superior to expert choices - anathema to
> > > bureaucracy. Might a regulator have trouble understanding what may limit
> > > his authority?
> > >
> > > Radiation benefit from hormesis has been well demonstrated, as described
> > > on this chat box. My purpose is to advance its medical use, much as UV B
> > > was used for the psoriasis patient I just saw.
> > > . . .
> > > ************************************************************************
> > > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> > > send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> > > radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> > > You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
> > >
> > ************************************************************************
> > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
> > send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
> > radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
> > You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/