Re: Apparent anti-correlations between geographic radiation and cancerare not surprising

[Kai Kaletsch <eic@shaw.ca>]

From: "Jacobus, John (NIH/OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>



> What I suggest is that you compare the cancer incident map with a

population

> density map.



I did. Correlation sucks. Not many people in northern New England but high

cancer rates. Similar around the Mississippi.



Kai



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/