[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Croatia, Slovenia in shared power plant dispute
Index:
Croatia, Slovenia in shared power plant dispute
Los Alamos Scientists Test Nuke Detector
Entergy faces legal claims for hazardous exposure
A dirty bomb may not kill, but it sure would hurt
Shinto priest opposed to nuke plant in Yamaguchi sacked
IAEA says Iran uranium plant nearly completed
=================================
Croatia, Slovenia in shared power plant dispute
ZAGREB, March 17 (Reuters) - Croatia said on Monday it will ask
neigbouring Slovenia for $56 million compensation for undistributed
electricity from the jointly-owned Krsko nuclear power plant in the
last eight months.
Croatia and Slovenia jointly built Krsko while they were federal
units in the former Yugoslavia in 1980s.
"We will ask for compensation of $56 million for the period between
June 30, 2002, and March 1, 2003. Also, we will demand between $5-6
million for every month of undistributed electricity from now on," a
Croatian power board HEP source told Reuters.
The dispute between the two neigbouring countries over Krsko broke
out in 1998 when Slovenian power monopoly Eles stopped distributing
electricity to HEP because of unpaid bills. It also moved to freeze
Croatia out by nationalising the power plant in July 1998.
The two countries reached an agreement last year to renew joint
management of the plant which Croatian parliament ratified to come
into force from June 30, 2002. Slovenia's parliament ratified it only
this month.
The agreement also proposes the sharing of future decommissioning
costs and the disposal of nuclear waste.
"Now, HEP should enter the Krsko power plant management board and
revise all the relevant documents related to how the plant operated
in the last few years. It will take some time, but it should not stop
the distribution of the electricity," the source, who asked not to be
named, said.
However, it is still unclear when distribution will restart, the
source added.
Croatia on Friday threatened to start an arbitration procedure unless
it fully rejoins Krsko's management within the next 60 days.
Slovenian environment minister Janez Kopac told Croatian daily
Jutarnji list on Sunday that Slovenia would prefer Croatia to sell
its stake.
Croatia has considered that option in the past, but the two sides
failed to agree on the price. Croatia said it wanted $717.5 million
for its stake while Slovenia insisted it should not pay more than
roughly $150 million.
------------------
Los Alamos Scientists Test Nuke Detector
Nuclear weapons hidden inside shipping containers or trucks could be
detected by using tiny subatomic particles that shower the Earth from
the sky, federal scientists suggest.
The high-energy particles, called muons, scatter in a highly
predictable pattern when they strike dense materials like uranium or
the lead used in heavy shielding, and that scattering could be picked
up by a special detector, the scientists said.
The researchers, at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico,
present successful results from small-scale testing in Thursday's
issue of the journal Nature.
The main drawback for such detectors is that they are slow, making
them impractical for use in high-volume situations. X-ray detectors
can scan large trucks in seconds; the muon detector would take
minutes, the researchers said.
``You have only so many muons, and you can't exactly go out and get
more,'' said Ralph James, associate director of the Brookhaven
National Laboratory.
But the researchers are hopeful that the concept can be improved upon
so that in the future, large detectors could screen shipping
containers at coastal ports or trucks traveling through border
checkpoints.
``It surprised us that it worked so well,'' said William C.
Priedhorsky, chief scientist for international security at Los
Alamos.
``You can build a muon detector out of argon gas and extruded
aluminum and stainless steel wire, so you don't need something that's
obviously high-cost,'' Priedhorsky said.
The device could be laid out as a platform that trucks could drive
onto for testing, or even a kind of conveyor belt for large shipping
containers, the researchers say.
James said existing X-ray scanners with adjustable high-energy
intensity would remain more reliable for quick testing, but the muon
detector could be useful for situations where X-ray machines are
unavailable or impractical - such as scanning a suspicious container
at a remote site without any power supply.
George Greene, a Brookhaven researcher who independently proposed the
idea at the same time the Los Alamos researchers began their work,
said using computers could speed up a muon detection system.
Andrew Karam, a University of Rochester researcher and expert on
``dirty bombs,'' said a muon detector could reveal the heavy lead
shielding needed to transport or store a dirty bomb. Such weapons use
conventional explosives to spread radioactive particles.
``As it is now, it would make a great screening tool for specific
objects. But if they can find a way to scale it up to do it more
quickly, it could be very valuable,'' Karam said.
On the Net:
Nature magazine: http://www.nature.com
--------------------
Entergy faces legal claims for hazardous exposure
NEW YORK, March 19 (Reuters) - Entergy Corp. <ETR.N>, the No. 2 U.S.
provider of nuclear power, said on Wednesday it has more than 3,000
legal claims pending from former employees seeking damages for
alleged exposure to asbestos and other hazardous materials.
The New Orleans company said in its annual report that three of its
electric utility units -- Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, and
Entergy New Orleans -- are named in the claims, which were filed
primarily by former contractor employees that worked for the units
between 1950 and 1980.
The suits have been filed in federal and state courts in both Texas
and Louisiana, where Entergy said judges and juries "have
demonstrated a willingness to grant large verdicts" to plaintiffs,
therefore posing "significant business risk."
Other defendants are also named in the suits.
The company has set aside reserves to cover any potential
liabilities, which it expects will not be material to its financial
position or results from operations.
Including defense costs, the company said it has already resolved
more than 3,000 claims since 1992 for a total of less than $13
million.
The company was not immediately available for comment on further
details of the claims.
------------------
A dirty bomb may not kill, but it sure would hurt
VIENNA, (Reuters) - After Sept. 11, 2001, nuclear experts realized
the danger of handling deadly radioactive material would not deter
suicidal maniacs who could hijack a plane and ram it into a
skyscraper.
They asked what would happen if al Qaeda got one of the world's
thousands of lost radioactive sources, attached an explosive like
dynamite and exploded it in a major urban center.
Britain said in January it had evidence that al Qaeda, widely thought
to be behind the attack that toppled New York City's World Trade
Center, had tried to develop such a bomb in the 1990s.
Wolfgang Weiss, head of radiation hygiene at Germany's Federal Office
for Radiation Protection, prepared a hypothetical case study to show
what would happen if a radiation dispersal device -- popularly known
as a dirty bomb -- exploded in Munich.
The results, based on an imaginary bomb made with weapons-grade
plutonium placed in Munich's Olympic Stadium, were superficially
reassuring: There would probably be no deaths and the number of
severely contaminated victims would be small.
"According to the calculations I did, the radiological impact would
be very limited, though the wider impact to society would be large,"
Weiss told Reuters during the first global conference on dirty bombs.
Severe contamination would likely occur at the center of the
explosion in the stadium, which has a capacity of almost 70,000. He
said that at three miles from the stadium, radiation levels would
drop by a factor of 100, resulting in only mild exposure levels.
DANGEROUS, BUT NOT DEADLY
Disregarding damage from the explosion itself, Weiss said exposure
for someone near the bomb "would require emergency medical treatment,
but it would not lead to death."
If the radioactive material was cesium, a common easy-to-disperse
radioactive powder used in medicine and agriculture, victims would be
exposed to quite low levels.
"These models tell us that you wouldn't have to evacuate a huge city.
You would concentrate on an area of a few kilometers," from the
explosion, Weiss said.
But the bomb would cause panic, and it would be crucial for political
leaders to behave calmly, to speak honestly and in clear, easy-to-
understand language about the attack.
"It's not primarily a radiological problem which we'd face; it's a
psychological problem and a problem that has to do with trust in a
society in their leaders," he said.
Failure to handle the situation properly could turn a manageable
crisis, which emergency response teams should be capable of managing,
into a disaster.
But Weiss said specific case scenarios were not a good basis for
preparing a government on how to respond to an attack.
"You have to be ready to be flexible, ready for everything. Reality
is always different," Weiss said. "Before the events in New York on
September 11, nobody thought it was possible."
Dirty bombs hit the headlines in May 2002, when U.S. authorities
captured Jose Padilla, an American al Qaeda operative, in Chicago and
prevented a dirty bomb attack.
But there has never been a dirty bomb attack, so scientists and
policymakers still have no actual case to examine.
This is why Weiss and others look closely at a tragedy in southern
Brazil considered to be the benchmark dirty bomb scenario. This case
shows that while the number of deaths may be low, the long-term
effects of such an attack could be severe.
GOIANIA: THE DIRTY-BOMB BENCHMARK
On September 13, 1987, two men in Goiania, Brazil were looking for
scrap metal at a partly demolished medical clinic.
They found a radiation therapy machine containing a small canister of
highly radioactive cesium powder. Unaware of what it was, they sold
it to a junkyard dealer, who took the canister apart.
Within two weeks, local children discovered the glowing blue powder.
Some even used it as body paint.
This quickly led to a catastrophe that was second only to the 1986
accident at the Chernobyl nuclear reactor. A total of 249 people were
exposed, 10 were seriously injured and four died.
The long-term socio-economic effects were devastating. Goiania
suffered a 20 percent drop in gross domestic product, which took five
years to return to normal levels.
Tourism in the tropical town dropped to zero and Goiania found itself
the victim of economic discrimination, as demand for food and other
products from the area plummeted.
"Imagine it would happen here in Vienna," Weiss said. "The city would
never be the same."
TRAFFICKING IN RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS
"We need to take into account Murphy's Law -- whatever can go wrong,
will go wrong eventually," said Chris Schmitzer of the Health Physics
Division from Austria's ARC research laboratories in Seibersdorf,
referring to the possibility of a dirty bomb attack.
According to the United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency, there have
been more than 280 confirmed cases of illicit trafficking in
radioactive materials since 1993, though the agency suspects the
actual number may be much higher.
Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the U.N. International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA), said the threat of a dirty bomb attack was real and
urged speedy improvements in the security of radioactive sources and
border controls to keep them out of the hands of terrorists.
"The fact that you haven't seen (a dirty bomb attack) yet doesn't
mean one isn't imminent," ElBaradei said.
Cesium, which ravaged Goiania, is one of many deadly radioactive
sources that have fallen out of regulatory control through loss or
theft across the former Soviet Union, the world's hotspot for illicit
trafficking in radioactive material.
"Our database of cases of smuggling gives an indication that there is
a market and there is an effort to obtain radioactive sources, and
the obvious question is why," ElBaradei said.
-------------------
Shinto priest opposed to nuke plant in Yamaguchi sacked
YAMAGUCHI, Japan, March 17 (Kyodo) - An organization overseeing
Shinto shrines in Yamaguchi Prefecture said Monday it has sacked a
priest who opposed the sale of shrine land for the construction of a
Chugoku Electric Power Co. nuclear power plant.
Haruhiko Hayashi, head priest of the Hachimangu shrine, opposes the
sale of land in the town of Kaminoseki for the plant, and was fired
Sunday.
The organization said Hayashi ''refused to talk with his congregation
and failed to conduct rituals sufficiently. We have therefore judged
him to have failed to perform his duties as a priest.''
A senior official of the organization denied the dismissal was
related to the stalled land sale, but the move could herald renewed
action to build the plant.
Hayashi maintains that a nuclear power plant ''poses a risk to
humankind.'' Many members of his congregation have favored the
nuclear project.
People in the congregation demanded talks with Hayashi to discuss the
issue, but he declined. He has not appeared in public lately, citing
worries about his personal safety.
In October 2000, congregation members submitted a request for his
dismissal to the Shinto organization, and it referred the matter to
the Association of Shinto Shrines, a national Shinto body in Tokyo,
in March 2001.
The association sent Hayashi a letter dated March 7, urging him to
hold talks with his congregation on the issue. Hayashi refused,
calling it ''unfair coercion.''
The shrine owns about 10 hectares of wooded land. Chugoku Electric
plans to build a nuclear reactor on part of it.
-------------------
IAEA says Iran uranium plant nearly completed
VIENNA, March 17 (Reuters) - The chief of the U.N's nuclear watchdog
said on Monday Iran has nearly completed the uranium enrichment plant
at the centre of U.S. accusations that Tehran wants to develop
nuclear weapons and was working on another.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei did
not respond to repeated U.S. accusations that Iran's nuclear
programme was intended to develop the capacity to build nuclear
weapons in the text of his comments prepared for the board after an
inspection trip to Iran last month.
"My colleagues and I were able to visit a number of facilities --
including a gas centrifuge enrichment pilot plant at Natanz that is
nearly ready for operation, and a much larger enrichment facility
still under construction at the same site," ElBaradei told the
agency's board.
The same technology used to enrich uranium to make reactor fuel can
be used to make the highly-enriched material required for a nuclear
bomb, although Iran has said it only intends to make reactor fuel.
U.S. President George W. Bush named Iran as a member of an "axis of
evil" alongside Iraq and North Korea, who the United States accuse of
seeking to develop or harbour nuclear, chemical or biological
weapons.
The claims have appeared amid Washington's preparations to go to war
against Iraq over U.S. allegations that Baghdad has weapons of mass
destruction.
ElBaradei reiterated his call to Iran to help dispel doubts about its
nuclear ambitions by signing up to the IAEA's "Additional Protocol"
which would allow inspectors freer access to Iran's nuclear sites
with little prior warning.
Iran has unveiled details of an ambitious nuclear energy programme,
from mining uranium ore to managing the spent fuel from atomic
reactors.
The Islamic Republic has said it wants to be generating 6,000 MW of
electricity from atomic power plants by 2022 to meet the growing
energy demand of its 65 million population.
-------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Director, Technical
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100 Extension 2306
Fax:(714) 668-3149
E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/