[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bq soon
I'd appreciate an answer to the question, "What is the cost involved in not
switching?" I'm not being sarcastic, but I can't think of any significant
cost. If there were, we'd have switched by now. We seem to be able to live
with a system where the academics use the metric system and the "real world"
uses English units.
I'm certainly not one to hide my light under a 35.2 liter basket, but the
problem is not the PhD's, it's the numerous other workers, eg., electricians,
mechanics, construction workers, even health physics technicians whom we have to
help work safely.
I know that Shell gas stations in my area started selling gasoline in liters,
ca. 1982. This was NOT accepted by the public, and they soon went back to
gallons.
If it ain't broke, please don't try to fix it.
The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.
Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.com
"Michael G. Stabin" wrote:
> ...
>
> I return us to where our conversation started - what is the cost involved,
> human and monetary, in not switching between the unit systems and making
> more mistakes? ...
> OK, I'll throw it open to anyone on the list (Americans) - does anyone have
> trouble understanding how much volume is in a 2 liter bottle? How painful
> and impossible was that?
>
> Mike
>
> Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
> Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Vanderbilt University
> 1161 21st Avenue South
> Nashville, TN 37232-2675
> Phone (615) 343-0068
> Fax (615) 322-3764
> Pager (615) 835-5153
> e-mail michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu
> internet www.doseinfo-radar.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bq soon
- From: "John Johnson" <idias@interchange.ubc.ca>