RadSafe Archive Main Index April, 2003

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• RE: ALARA (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• HP TECH QUALIFICATION SURVEY (0) Joseph Heckman
  
• Re: FW: A question regarding radiation p (0) John Andrews
  
• It's Not Too Late to Strengthen Your Rad (0) CONTEDU
  
• Internationally Accepted Effluent Releas (0) Doug Schult
  
• Any good literature on safe handling of (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: US forces' use of depleted uranium w (0) BobCherry
  
• Iodine Volatility (0) john.gumnick
  
• RE: Servicemen's health in danger By DAV (1) BobCherry
  
• RE: Internationally Accepted Effluent Re (1) Yusko, James
  
• Position Opening (0) Louie Cueva
  
• FWD: Seeking multi-building facilities w (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Re: US forces' use of depleted uranium w (0) RuthWeiner
  
• DOT Question (1) Oldewage, Hans D
  
• Re: US forces' use of depleted uranium w (1) EMCTGA
  
• Position Opening (amended) (0) Louie Cueva
  
• Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (3) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: Servicemen's health in danger By DAV (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: DOT Question (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Instrument Response / Training Issu (0) Gv1
  
• RE: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (0) modsafety
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (1) Michael Hahn
  
• Re: US forces' use of depleted uranium w (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: DOT Question (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: DOT Question (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• RE: [cdn-nucl-l] Re: giant natural nucl (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Internationally Accepted Effluent Re (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (1) garyi
  
• Canadians uninformed about nuclear waste (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (0) North, David
  
• No Subject (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• No Subject (1) Larry Boing
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Article: Success Stories Abound in Effor (0) John Jacobus
  
• Picture of damaged gauge (1) NORTH, Ralph
  
• Re: (0) John Johnson
  
• RE: Article: Success Stories Abound in E (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• FDA: Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposure t (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Thorium Bioassays (0) ProRadCon
  
• Draft guidance on KI Shelf Life (0) Kraus, George W.
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (0) John Jacobus
  
• Energy Bill May Ease Uranium Restriction (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: [cdn-nucl-l] Re: giant natural nucl (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Article: Success Stories Abound in E (0) John Jacobus
  
• Pinellas man to head nuclear agency [NRC (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• No environmental review needed for forme (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposure to (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Picture of damaged gauge (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: No environmental review needed for f (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• RE: DOT Question (1) Boomologist
  
• Gammacom dosimeters (0) Boomologist
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] [Fwd: Draft guidance on (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: AMRSO: Picture of damaged gauge (0) Vincent Chase
  
• Re: DOT Question (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: DOT Question (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• RE: AMRSO: Picture of damaged gauge (0) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposure to (1) LancerGT
  
• AW: Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposure to (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• computer codes for neutron shielding cal (0) JGinniver
  
• FDA: Prussian Blue for Internal Contamin (0) Jodi.Strzelczyk
  
• Re: Damage stays from low-dose X-rays (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: computer codes for neutron shielding (1) JPreisig
  
• Re: AMRSO: Picture of damaged gauge (0) Roger Pedersen
  
• medical misadministration to child (1) William V Lipton
  
• Capacity at Japanese nuclear reactors dr (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: computer codes for neutron shielding (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: medical misadministration to child (1) North, David
  
• Re: AW: Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposur (1) LancerGT
  
• RE: medical misadministration to child (1) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposure to Rad (0) LancerGT
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (3) John Jacobus
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (2) William V Lipton
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: medical misadministration to child (0) John Jacobus
  
• AW: AW: Prussian Blue as Tmt for Exposur (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Teen cellphone radiation risk (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• LNT Theory (0) RadSafeInst
  
• RE: Teen cellphone radiation risk (0) Rogers Brent
  
• Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer? (was RE: Te (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• "Becquerels NEVER!", formerly Re: medica (2) William V Lipton
  
• Bq soon (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: Bq soon (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: "Becquerels NEVER!", formerly Re: me (0) Mages, Robert
  
• Risk Values in Parade Magazine (0) Tupin.Edward
  
• RE: Bq soon (2) Faillace, Ernie
  
• RE: Bq soon (0) Perron Harvard C PSNS
  
• DU legislation? (2) Philip Egidi
  
• RE: Bq soon (0) James Reese
  
• Re: Bq soon (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Bq soon (0) John Johnson
  
• California: "New debate on radiation at (0) BobCherry
  
• diagnostic physics position (0) mejafari
  
• RE: LNT Theory (1) Grimm, Lawrence
  
• Re: DU legislation? (1) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: Bq soon (0) Roger Fenner
  
• Re: DU legislation? (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: LNT Theory (0) Wesley
  
• Re: DU legislation? (0) BobCherry
  
• RE: Bq soon:Why this discussion again ? (2) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• RE: medical misadministration to child (1) North, David
  
• RE: DU legislation? (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Bq soon (1) Jeffries Cameron
  
• RCT or HP Tech's-Based in Oak Ridge, TN (0) Debby Shonka
  
• Re: "Becquerels NEVER!", formerly Re: me (0) Richard Smart
  
• RE: medical misadministration to child (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: Bq soon:Why this discussion again ? (1) Vincent King
  
• Re: Bq soon (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: Bq soon (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Bq soon (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: DU legislation? (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Faults in Swedish study adressed by J. M (0) Michael Hahn
  
• Subject: RE: Bq soon (0) Ivor Surveyor
  
• Re: Bq soon (0) Graham Roger Stevenson
  
• International Workshop on Radiation Prot (0) Secretariat
  
• APPLIED PHYSICS 2003 - Nuclear Topics (0) Secretariat
  
• International Workshop on Radiation Prot (0) Secretariat
  
• APPLIED PHYSICS 2003 - Nuclear Topics (0) Secretariat
  
• Short ?positive? article (0) Cary Renquist
  
• Nuclear bomb radiation drug shows promis (1) joseph.greco
  
• Bq Soon (1) Bill.Teer
  
• Re: Bq soon (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Bq Soon (Corrected) (0) Bill.Teer
  
• RE: Bq soon (2) mark.hogue
  
• RE: Bq soon:Why this discussion again ? (1) William Prestwich
  
• RE: Short ?positive? article (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Re: Nuclear bomb radiation drug shows pr (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Bq soon (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Bq soon:Why this discussion again ? (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: DU legislation? (0) John Johnson
  
• RE: DU legislation?(Perception/Reality) (2) Marthaller, Chris
  
• RE: Bq soon (1) Neil, David M
  
• AAP Statement on Radiation Disasters and (1) Potter, Gus
  
• SI Units (1) Brian Keele
  
• RE: Short ?positive? article (0) Cary Renquist
  
• Documenting Scanning Surveys (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• Cloud Chamber Experiment (0) Joe Dadourian
  
• Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disasters (2) A. Grosso
  
• Harvard Announces Radioactivity in the E (0) CONTEDU
  
• RE: AAP Statement on Radiation Disasters (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Bq Soon (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• SI unit of WL (was: Bq soon) (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• AW: Bq Soon (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Request for Vendor Names on First-Respon (0) Ken Smith
  
• politics (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Fwd: Nuclear Engineering Faculty Positio (0) Erik F. Shores
  
• AW: Bq soon:Why this discussion again ? (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Bq soon (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Peak elimination (1) Hart, Diana
  
• AW: DU legislation?(Perception/Reality) (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Bq soon (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Bq Soon (0) Flowerday, Scott
  
• AW: SI Units (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: AAP Statement on Radiation Disasters (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Ingesting Iodine Dangerous as KI Substit (0) Shane Connor
  
• RE: Bq soon:Why this discussion again ? (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Subject: RE: Bq soon (1) Sonter Mark
  
• RE: SI unit of WL (was: Bq soon) (2) Jeffries Cameron
  
• Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disasters (0) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: SI unit of WL (was: Bq soon) (0) Cristian S. Nicolau
  
• Re: SI unit of WL (was: Bq soon) (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: DU legislation? (0) RadSafeInst
  
• RE: Subject: RE: Bq soon (0) George J. Vargo
  
• RE: Subject: RE: Bq soon (1) Rogers Brent
  
• Re: DU legislation?(Perception/Reality) (0) Les Aldrich
  
• Re: Peak elimination (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Subject: RE: Bq soon [Scanned] (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Re: Peak elimination (0) glandry
  
• FW: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (0) jkuperus
  
• Re: Subject: RE: Bq soon (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: Subject: RE: Bq soon (1) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: DU Source (0) Lessler.Richard
  
• Re: Subject: RE: Bq soon (0) William V Lipton
  
• Activity of a calibration source? (1) Thompson, Donald L.
  
• Nuclear bomb radiation drug shows promis (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: DU Source (0) BobCherry
  
• request help from majordomo (1) Johansen, Kjell
  
• Re: Activity of a calibration source? (0) Eli Port
  
• Nuclear Smoking Gun in Iraq? (0) Mercado, Don
  
• clean it up (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• FW: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (0) Shane Connor
  
• RE: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• RE: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (0) jkuperus
  
• RE: request help from majordomo (0) Neil, David M
  
• Tooth Fairy Project- Nukes via drinking (1) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (0) John Johnson
  
• Re: Tooth Fairy Project- Nukes via drink (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Tooth Fairy Project- Nukes via drink (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Ingesting Iodine Dangerous as KI Sub (0) Jane Bragg
  
• RE: Nuclear Smoking Gun in Iraq? (1) Mercado, Don
  
• FW: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (1) Patricia Milligan
  
• RE: Nuclear Smoking Gun in Iraq? (0) Richard F. Orthen
  
• Re: Tooth Fairy Project- Nukes via drink (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re DU source and Gulf Illness (2) Lessler.Richard
  
• Re: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (1) John Andrews
  
• Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Fwd: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (1) BobCherry
  
• Re: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) Vincent King
  
• AW: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation Disas (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Source of DU (0) Bolling, Jason E
  
• RE: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Contents list and abstracts (0) E.P. Goldfinch
  
• Re: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: AW: Re: AAP Statement on Radiation D (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (1) RuthWeiner
  
• 22nd Annual International Dosimetry Symp (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• TEPCO proposes spent nuclear fuel storag (0) Sandy Perle
  
• training facilities in Georgia (0) celiar
  
• RE: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) Daxon, Eric G COL MEDCOM HQ
  
• Re: Tooth Fairy Project- Nukes via drink (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• SCCHPS/SDCHPS Meeting on May 1, 2003 (0) Tosh Ushino, CHP
  
• SUBSCRIBE radsafe maury@webtexas.com (0) Majordomo
  
• Liquid Scintillation Counter Available? (0) Joel Antkowiak
  
• Re: California: "New debate on radiation (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: California: "New debate on radiation (0) maury
  
• RE: training facilities in Georgia (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Transportation of Normal Form Exempt Qua (0) Eric Cieszkiewicz
  
• Re: California: "New debate on radiation (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: California: "New debate on radiation (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Health Physics Journal TOC (0) HPbabusby
  
• dry ice (1) NORTH, Ralph
  
• RE: dry ice (1) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Re DU source and Gulf Illness (0) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• Re: dry ice (0) maury
  
• A Man, A Plan, A Tin Can (0) Kubric
  
• Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> acid (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• fission product source terms..... (1) Dave Brown
  
• Re: fission product source terms..... (1) David Matchick
  
• RE: fission product source terms..... (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: fission product source terms..... (0) Dave Brown
  
• Re: fission product source terms..... (0) Leon E Brown
  
• Re: fission product source terms..... (0) JOHN.RICH
  
• Cleared SR RCTs needed for Oak Ride, TN (0) Stephanie Long
  
• RE: dry ice (0) Mercado, Don
  
• Japanese Utility Shuts Down Nuclear Grid (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: dry ice (0) maury
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• No Subject (0) Larry Boing
  
• RE: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (1) Joseph Heckman
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• HP and Rad Health Handbook, 1998... (0) Dave Brown
  
• US DOT seeks comment on small bus. impac (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• UF6 Truck crashes in Tenn, USA; nothing (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• RE: HP and Rad Health Handbook, 1998... (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• RE: HP and Rad Health Handbook, 1998... (0) Ron Mlekodaj
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: dry ice (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Need a contact for Addenbrooke's Hospita (1) james.g.barnes
  
• RE: Ingesting Iodine Dangerous as KI Sub (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: UF6 Truck crashes in Tenn, USA; noth (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (1) jkuperus
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) BobCherry
  
• RE: Ingesting Iodine Dangerous as KI Sub (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: UF6 Truck crashes in Tenn, USA; noth (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Need a contact for Addenbrooke's Hos (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) jkuperus
  
• UF6 Cylinders (0) Bolling, Jason E
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (2) Potter, Gus
  
• Scientist have problem movie natural rea (1) John Jacobus
  
• New Scientist Reports on DU and Iraq (1) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: Scientist have problem movie natural (2) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Background Around the World (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• Re: Scientist have problem movie natural (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: (0) John Johnson
  
• Now Hiring (0) Jeremiah Sauber
  
• Re: UF6 Cylinders (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Scientist have problem movie natural (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: Kr-85 -> ionization -> oxidants -> a (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: (0) Andrew McEwan
  
• Re: New Scientist Reports on DU and Iraq (0) Ivor Surveyor
  
• DNA repair mechanism that can lead to mu (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Scientist have problem movie natural (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: New Scientist Reports on DU and Iraq (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Rocky Flats worker study (0) Tony Harrison
  
• New Detector (0) Elaine Marshall
  
• RE: New Detector (2) Doty, Patrick
  
• RE: New Detector (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Florida Drinking water (0) Gv1
  
• Re: New Scientist Reports on DU and Iraq (1) maury
  
• Looking to Hire: CHP, Sr. HP...Immediate (0) ProRadCon
  
• Heineken Restarts Contaminated Brewery (1) Jim Hoerner
  
• RE: New Detector (1) Jim Kost
  
• RE: New Detector (1) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Re: New Scientist Reports on DU and Iraq (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• AW: Heineken Restarts Contaminated Brewe (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: New Detector (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: New Detector (0) Doty, Patrick
  
• RE: New Detector (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• DU, Agent Orange: Junk Science? (0) BobCherry
  
• As usual -- to account for these events, (1) maury
  
• RE: New Detector (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• RE: New Detector (0) Brian Rees
  
• Re: New Detector (0) Bob Hearn
  
• On TV tonight ... (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Oak Ridge Associated Universities PTP Co (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: As usual -- to account for these eve (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: As usual -- to account for these eve (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: As usual -- to account for these eve (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• job posting: physical scientist GS-13 (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• Re: As usual -- to account for these eve (3) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: New Detector (0) Doty, Patrick
  
• Re: As usual -- to account for these eve (0) John Jacobus
  
• AW: As usual -- to account for these eve (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Food irradiaiton article on CBS News web (0) Tosh Ushino, CHP
  
• Re: As usual -- to account for these eve (1) maury
  
• Policies on Laboratory Safety (0) Eli Port
  
• Re: Fission Stories (1) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: As usual -- to account for these eve (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: [Know_Nukes] Re: Fission Stories (0) John Jacobus
  
• article on Namibia (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Question on Properties of Aluminum at Re (3) Paul E. Benneche
  
• Question Balliunas, B. Cohen, York et al (0) hflong
  
• AW: Question on Properties of Aluminum a (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• How Changes in U.S. Census Counts Af fec (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Question on Properties of Aluminum a (0) John Johnson
  
• U & NORM Training (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: Question on Properties of Aluminum a (0) John Andrews
  
• Position Announcement (0) Erick Lindstrom
  
• Radiography chirpers (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Re: Radiography chirpers (1) james.g.barnes
  
• FW: Cabinet x-ray FAQ on the web! (0) Kraus, George W.
  
• Re: As usual -- to account for these eve (0) Maury Siskel
  
• Re: Radiography chirpers (1) Tom Hazlett
  
• Re: Radiography chirpers (0) JGinniver
  
• seeking a >200milli-Ci Am-241 sealed sou (0) Ed Hill
  
• Puskin article (1) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: Radiography chirpers (0) John Andrews
  
• criticality video (0) Monica Oosting
  
• DOT/IATA Rad Shipment 8 hr Training - NJ (0) Vincent Chase
  
• Radioprotection of the environment (Conf (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Puskin article (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Air Pollution May Damage Brain, Heart (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• HOTSPOT..... (0) Dave Brown
  
• Re: Fission Stories (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) John Johnson
  
• UK to help remove DU remnants from Iraq (0) JGinniver
  
• " DAVIS-BESSE EVENT DID NOT ENDANGER PUB (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) John Jacobus
  
• Los Angeles gets radiation detectors (1) goldinem
  
• RE: Puskin article[Scanned] (2) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Course on Shielding of Radiation Therapy (0) Nisy Ipe
  
• RE: Puskin article[Scanned] (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Bismuth breaks half-life record (2) Dan Hoffman
  
• RE: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Possible demise of intervascular brachyt (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Coloration of Inovision 451-Series Meter (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (3) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Bismuth breaks half-life record (2) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Job Opportunity in San Diego, CA: Assist (0) Salvador, Marisol
  
• RE: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• AW: Los Angeles gets radiation detectors (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) maury
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• MS programs (0) garyi
  
• WG: Question on Properties of Aluminum a (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: MS programs (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: Award offer (2) Wesley
  
• Re: Award offer (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Award offer (1) epirad
  
• Re: Award offer (0) epirad
  
• RE: Award offer (0) epirad
  
• Cohen's Reward (1) epirad
  
• Email to CBS News outlet in Dallas Texas (1) Maury Siskel
  
• kVp Instruments (0) Knapp, Steven J.
  
• NG blast (again) (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Puskin article[Scanned] (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Puskin article[Scanned] (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (2) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: NG blast (again) (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: NG blast (again) (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Los Angeles gets radiation detectors (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• fallout shelter sign history (0) KJ Kearfott
  
• RE: Award offer (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Award offer (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Award offer (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Award offer (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's Reward (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (1) epirad
  
• Safety Statistics Board (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: Email to CBS News outlet in Dallas T (1) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Award offer (0) epirad
  
• Reward Ground Rules (0) epirad
  
• Tokaimura question (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: fallout shelter sign history (0) Bolling, Jason E
  
• RE: Puskin article[Scanned] (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Award offer (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Email to CBS News outlet in Dallas T (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Award offer (0) epirad
  
• FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional Count (0) MCCONNELL, MICHAEL E
  
• RE: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• AW: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Tokaimura question (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: NG blast (again) (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• RE: "Curies forever" (again) (1) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Email to CBS News outlet in Dallas T (0) maury
  
• RE: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• atmospheric dispersion/dilution.......qu (2) Dave Brown
  
• Porcelain Electrical Insulators (1) ray ilson
  
• [Fwd: [Know_Nukes] Thyroid cancer rises (0) Norman Cohen
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Reward Ground Rules (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Bismuth breaks half-life record (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (found t (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Bernie's original post raising the "rew (1) Sandy Perle
  
• The original $1000 offer post (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Environmental News Network story (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: AW: Bismuth breaks half-life record (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (1) Carl Miller
  
• Re: The original $1000 offer post (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• U-235 Weight Percent for Natural Uranium (1) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• RE: Porcelain Electrical Insulators (0) Neil, David M
  
• The original 1997 Reward Post (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• RE: What excuse next for no pay (0) Gray, William
  
• Re: atmospheric dispersion/dilution..... (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: atmospheric dispersion/dilution..... (0) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Bernie's original post raising the (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Possible Biomarker for Densely Ionizing (0) Falo, Gerald A Dr HMJF
  
• RE: atmospheric dispersion/dilution..... (0) Wesley
  
• RE: U-235 Weight Percent for Natural Ura (0) Mike Zemyan
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (1) Carl Miller
  
• RE: U-235 Weight Percent for Natural Ura (0) Mark G. Virgil
  
• Re: atmospheric dispersion/dilution..... (0) JOHN.RICH
  
• Bogus reward offers (3) Carl Miller
  
• Re: Bogus reward offers (1) Sandy Perle
  
• What excuse next for no pay (2) Carl Miller
  
• AW: Porcelain Electrical Insulators (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: U-235 Weight Percent for Natural Ura (0) Potter, Gus
  
• Re: Bogus reward offers (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• Re: Bogus reward offers (0) DSnowder
  
• RE: Porcelain Electrical Insulators (0) Sonter Mark
  
• Re: "Curies forever" (again) (0) Vincent King
  
• Aside from the reward issue... (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (0) Les Aldrich
  
• Shutdown of Indian Point 3 (0) Doty, Patrick
  
• Re: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Porcelain Electrical Insulators[Scan (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• RE: Porcelain Electrical Insulators (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• RE: U-235 Weight Percent for Natural Ura (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: Bogus reward offers (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• U-235 Abundance in Natural Urnaium (0) Leo M. Lowe
  
• Re: Bogus reward offers (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• CORRECTION U-235 Abundance in Natural Ur (0) Leo M. Lowe
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional C (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: What excuse next for no pay (0) Bernard Cohen
  
• RE: Bernie's original post raising the (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Aside from the reward issue... (1) John Jacobus
  
• 2nd try (0) Michael G. Stabin
  
• RE: FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional C (2) Doty, Patrick
  
• NASA Chief Touts Nuclear-Powered Craft (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Bernie's original post raising the (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional C (0) William V Lipton
  
• RCRA For Health Physicists (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional C (0) Doty, Patrick
  
• RE: FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional C (0) William Prestwich
  
• Offers and Answers (1) John Wong
  
• Re: Aside from the reward issue... (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: Bernie's original post raising the (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Offers and Answers (0) Somerville, Mark
  
• RE: FW: Tissue Equivalent Proportional C (0) Cary Renquist
  
• Re: Aside from the reward issue... (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Offers and Answers (0) garyi
  
• RE: NG blast (again) (0) Jim Hoerner
  
• Re: [MbrExchange] Re: NG blast (again) (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Aside from the reward issue... (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Aside from the reward issue... (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: "Curies forever" (again) (0) Steven Dapra