[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NCRP bias?
On Thu, 1 May 2003, Jerry Cohen wrote:
> I wonder if NCRP is really capable of giving your work an unbiased
> evaluation. Keep in mind that for decades NCRP has advocated and supported
> policies predicated on LNT, the most egregious being ALARA. Although the
> individuals making the evaluation may all be fine scientists, it is simply
> not consistent with human nature for NCRP to admit that they have been
> wrong for all those years.
--It is inconceivable to me that any scientist who carefully
studies my work can disregard it. I recognize that to many
epidemiologists it is a religious conviction that an ecological study
cannot be used to test a theory, but the NCRP committee includes
physicists who should not be influenced by that religious conviction.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/