[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NCRP bias?





On Thu, 1 May 2003, Jerry Cohen wrote:



>     I wonder if NCRP is really capable of giving your work an unbiased

> evaluation. Keep in mind that for decades NCRP has advocated and supported

> policies predicated on LNT, the most egregious being ALARA. Although the

> individuals making the evaluation may all be fine scientists, it is simply

> not consistent with human nature for NCRP to admit that they have been

> wrong for all those years.



	--It is inconceivable to me that any scientist who carefully

studies my work can disregard it. I recognize that to many

epidemiologists it is a religious conviction that an ecological study

cannot be used to test a theory, but the NCRP committee includes

physicists who should not be influenced by that religious conviction.



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/