[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NRC PROPOSES $6,000 FINE AGAINST ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITALINMICHIGAN FOR OVEREXPOSURE TO A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
It seems to me that the comfort, warmth, and satisfaction of being near a
dying loved one without the encumbrance of shielding might be well worth
an added 3-15 rem. In any case, why shouldn't the dose recipient be allowed
to make an informed choice in the matter without NRC interference?
> > >
> > > The hospital staff provided shielding around the patient to reduce
> > > radiation levels and counseled family members on the need to minimize
> > > their time and proximity to the patient. Family members, who wanted
> > > to maintain close contact with the patient, disregarded the radiation
> > > safety instructions provided by the staff.
> > >
> > > One family member, who spent the longest period of time in close
> > > contact with the patient, received a total dose of 3,000 to 15,000
> > > millirem (A millirem is a standard measure of radiation dose), which
> > > exceeds the NRC limit of 100 millirem per year. Other members of the
> > > family may have received significantly lower doses.
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/