[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Detailed evidence fails to support man-made climate change
Let me see. Who should carry more weight in the
debate of global warming: The National Academy of
Sciences (see
http://www.nap.edu/books/0309043867/html/index.html)
or a politician from Oklahoma?
And there are people on this list server who complain
about bad science?
--- maury <maury@webtexas.com> wrote:
> Recognizing the controversial nature for some; and
> granting perhaps
> tangential relevance to radiation safety and to risk
> analysis; I have
> bitten off both of my typing fingers and present
> only the links and the
> barest summary of Sen. Inhofe's excellent, detailed
> stake driven into
> the heart of anthropogenic global climate change
> ....
> Cheers,
> Maury maury@webtexas.com
> _________
> PP=PPP
> =============================
> The press release may be seen at:
> http://inhofe.senate.gov/preleases.htm
>
> The entire presentation is at:
> http://inhofe.senate.gov/floorspeeches.htm
>
>
> Monday, July 28, 2003
>
> INHOFE DELIVERS MAJOR SPEECH ON THE SCIENCE OF
> CLIMATE CHANGE
> “Catastrophic global warming alarmism not based on
> objective science”
>
> Washington, D.C.-Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.),
> chairman of
> the Committee on Environment and Public Works,
> delivered a comprehensive
> speech on the science of climate change today,
> concluding that, based on the best, most objective
> science available,
> predictions of catastrophic global warming are
> baseless and should be rejected.
>
> The following are excerpts from today’s press
> release:
>
> · “Much of the debate over global warming is
> predicated on fear, rather
> than science.”
>
> · “I have offered compelling evidence that
> catastrophic global warming
> is a hoax. That conclusion is supported by the
> painstaking work of the
> nation's top climate scientists.”
>
> “What have scientists concluded? The Kyoto Protocol
> has no environmental
> benefits; natural variability, not fossil fuel
> emissions, is the
> overwhelming factor influencing climate change;
> satellite data, confirmed by NOAA balloon
> measurements,
> confirms that no meaningful warming has occurred
> over the last century;
> and climate models predicting dramatic temperature
> increases over the
> next 100 years are flawed and highly imperfect.”
>
. . .
=====
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/