Re: Detailed evidence fails to support man-made climate change

[John Jacobus <crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM>]

Howard,

Once again, I cannot follow your arguements.  Could

you please get your assistant to translate these

ramblings.  



--- Howard Long <hflong@pacbell.net> wrote:

> Neither - the DATA should, as from satellites,

> sunspots, icecap

> temperatures, etc. NOT expanding urban heat islands.

> 

> Data can be reviewed at www.OISM.org/pproject.

> Seventeen thousand scientists reviewed data there

> and petitioned, 1, that

> man-made climate change is insignificant and. 2.

> that  more CO2 would be

> beneficial. This is 10x as many as were

> misrepresented into seeming to

> support Kyoto, so read the NAS statement carefully.

> 

> Pertinence to radiation safety is 1. the same

> authoriarian disinformation

> program is being used for the global warming myth as

> with the LNT myth and,

> 2,  many persons adhering to the one faith, also

> adhere to the other. Do you

> John?

> 

> Howard Long

. . .



=====

-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/