[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Laymans questions on hormesis and LNT



In general, any relatively healthy organism benefits from a moderate level of stress. To make a quantitative analysis of this would require MASSIVE data points and a ridiculous number of control subjects. I think this one is relegated to the realm of personal ideology. I chose to believe in hormesis.



Floyd W. Flanigan B.S.Nuc.H.P.



-----Original Message-----

From: John Jacobus [mailto:crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM]

Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:17 AM

To: BERNARD L COHEN; Dimiter Popoff

Cc: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re: Laymans questions on hormesis and LNT





Dr. Cohen

I agree.  That was what I was referring to by choosing

the appropriate end-point or result.  Sometime you do

get what you are looking for.



--- BERNARD L COHEN <blc+@PITT.EDU> wrote:

> 

> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Dimiter Popoff wrote:

> 

> > Since I have been on this list I have read words

> like 'hormesis' and LNT

> > innumerable times and eventually - although I have

> no medical knowledge - I

> > have some questions.

> 

> 	--I see no conflict between hormesis and LNT. LNT

> applies to

> cancer initiating DNA damage, and seems logical from

> that standpoint.

> However it must be recognized that this is added to

> a very large

> background of such DNA damage events occurring

> naturally, trillions of

> times per day in each person. If this were the only

> important thing, we

> would all die of cancer at a very young age.

> Hormesis arises from stimulation of repair enzyme

> production, stimulation

> of immune response, stimultion of apoptosis,

> modification of cell cycle

> timing, etc. There is no reason to believe that

> these vary linearly with

> dose, and there is direct evidence to the contrary,

> indicating that

> hormesis apples most to low level radiation.

> 	The only question is what happens when you add the

> two effects.

> There is strong evidence indicating that hormesis

> predominates for low

> level radiation. Where is the contrary evidence?

>

************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put

> the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 





=====

-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/