RE: Radium article

["Stewart Smith" <sssmith@scientech.com>]

It would be nice?? if the same people took an interest in finding homes for

the 28% of veterans that are homeless.



S.R. Smith



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Todd Brautigam

Sent: Tue, September 16, 2003 8:34 AM

To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re: Radium article





Not to mention the number of lives that could be saved by spending the money

where it's needed.



>>> <BobCherry@AOL.COM> 09/15/03 03:09PM >>>

In a message dated 9/15/2003 11:49:39 AM Central Daylight Time,

JOHN.RICH@sargentlundy.com writes:

After reading the reporters reply, it seemed like he was saying that

eliminating the 1 in 10,000 chance of causing cancer in one person equals

saving 1 life.   I guess this is the first time I looked closely at the

'anti' logic.   So, not to start a whole new thread, but have any of you

already come up with a "sound-bite" size rebuttal for this argument??

Some quick thoughts on "sound bites":



How can you prove that you saved that one life? Whose life was saved? Maybe

you spent the money and saved no one.



The "chance" does not go to zero. It goes to 1 in 12,000, 1 in 20,000, and

so

on. How much money are you willing to spend to reduce the chance? Whose

money

are you spending? Are you willing to kick in a few bucks of your own to

reduce that hypothetical chance (that, with inherent uncertainty, may

already be

zero)?



Bob C



The contents of this email and any attachments are strictly

confidential.  They may not be disclosed to someone who is not a named

or authorized recipient.  They may also be subject to legal

professional privilege and unauthorized disclosure, copying or use is

prohibited.



If you receive this e-mail in error please notify the sender by

replying using the words Misdirected E-mail in the subject, and  then

delete the message and any attachments from your system.



Although this e-mail and any attachments have been scanned for

viruses, the success of scanning products is not guaranteed. The

recipient(s) should therefore carry out any checks that they believe

to be appropriate in this respect.



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/