RadSafe Archive Mail Index September, 2003

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• RE: defining LDR (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• AW: defining LDR (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Depleted Uranium Golf Clubs? (0) BobCherry
  
• Radiological Emergency Preparedness: ... (1) maury
  
• re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Public land closed due to old Uraniu (0) Jim Otton
  
• re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (2) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Laymans questions on hormesis and LN (0) goldinem
  
• RE: Public land closed due to old Uraniu (0) Boomologist
  
• Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) maury
  
• Keithley Ion Chamber Parts (0) Joey Michael
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedness: (1) John Jacobus
  
• Interactive HP electronic resources (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedness: (0) maury
  
• Re: AW: Hanford Site cleanup standards (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedness: (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: Laymans questions on hormesis and LN (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: AW: Hanford Site cleanup standards (0) John Andrews
  
• SCCHPS Meeting - Thursday, September 25, (0) Tosh Ushino
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) BLHamrick
  
• re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) BLHamrick
  
• St. Louis Post-Dispatch Placarding Artic (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedness: (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedness: (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• George's Gems (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Radon and Respiratory protection (2) Jay Beckel
  
• Health Physicist Vacancy Announcement (0) Dave Brown
  
• Fellowship opportunities (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Fwd: Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Radon and Respiratory protection (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) The Wilsons
  
• RE: Radon and Respiratory protection (0) Philippe Duport
  
• Re: Fwd: Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Stand (0) The Wilsons
  
• OT: Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedn (0) Cary Renquist
  
• Re: Fwd: Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Stand (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) Mercado, Don
  
• OT: Re: Radiological Emergency Preparedn (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Fwd: Re: �Hanford Site Cleanup Stand (0) Taylor, Douglas
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Ted de Castro
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: St. Louis Post-Dispatch Placarding A (2) BLHamrick
  
• NEUMUNE (0) Susan McElrath
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) Steven Dapra
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: St. Louis Post-Dispatch Placarding A (0) Boomologist
  
• Re: St. Louis Post-Dispatch Placarding A (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: St. Louis Post-Dispatch Placarding A (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Cleanup Standards/litigation (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Auger (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Ted de Castro
  
• TS-R-1 applied to uranium and thorium or (0) Paul Hinrichsen
  
• RE: Auger (1) Thompson, Donald L.
  
• RE: Auger (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Vincent King
  
• Technician position at Texas A&M. (0) Menchaca, Daniel I
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (1) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) John Jacobus
  
• Radioactive transport as an ultrahazardo (0) Steven G. Sawhill
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Auger (0) RuthWeiner
  
• UNSUBSCRIBE radsafe "Walker, Scottie" <s (0) Majordomo
  
• RE: Auger (0) Jim Otton
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: Auger (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• RE: Auger (0) Hall, David A.
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Auger (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• assessment of risk from doses recieved d (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Re: Radon and Respiratory protection (1) GELSG
  
• Sorry for this (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: Auger (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: BPAC protests uranium (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Radon and Respiratory protection (0) Allen, David
  
• RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and C (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Auger (0) Miller, Mark L
  
• News Article: A new place to store toxi (0) John Jacobus
  
• Olde Survey Inst manuals (0) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Maple 1&2 (0) Priya Doshi
  
• RE: Maple 1&2 (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Olde Manuals-Catalogs II (0) Frame, Paul
  
• FW: Atomic Data and Nuclear Tables Refer (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Lobbyist is hired to back SRS pit plant (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Panasonic dosimetry equipment needed (0) R. J. Gunter
  
• week of Sep 8 (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Radon and Respiratory protection (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Recent IAEA TECDOC Series (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (1) John Jacobus
  
• calculators (0) McCray, Dave
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (1) John Jacobus
  
• Ludlum 300 Manual; Thanks to all (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (2) Jerry Cohen
  
• RE: News Article: A new place to store (0) Jaro
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (1) John Jacobus
  
• Am interested in buying older ICRP publi (0) Rick Haaker, CHP, CIH
  
• News Article: Nuclear university promot (0) John Jacobus
  
• densitometer crushed [FW] (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Auger (1) Cary Renquist
  
• Safety Manual (0) Dwight M. Salisbury
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (3) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (0) John Jacobus
  
• Feds end radioactivity monitoring (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Auger (0) Philippe Duport
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (0) John Jacobus
  
• Security of Sealed Radioactive Sources (0) Susan McElrath
  
• Security of Sealed Radioactive Sources (0) Susan McElrath
  
• GAO report on sealed sources (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Security of Sealed Radioactive Sources (0) Susan McElrath
  
• Disposal of empty Kr-85 gas cylinders (0) Tom Morgan
  
• Edward Teller (1) Kim D. Merritt
  
• Laser Safety Signs (1) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: News Article: A new place to store (0) BobCherry
  
• World Nuclear University (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• Panasonic UD-802 dosimeters (0) Stanford Dosimetry
  
• Old NBS [NCRP] Neutron Reference (0) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Re: Laser Safety Signs (0) Cary Renquist
  
• RE: Disposal of empty Kr-85 gas cylinder (0) Baratta, Edmond J
  
• Laser Safety Signs - thanks (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Four Non-HPs Against One Health Physicis (3) BobCherry
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) Vincent King
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) Jerry Cohen
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) Vincent King
  
• [Fwd: Re: dry ice] (0) maury
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) Sam Iverstine
  
• Fwd: DUFwd: DU (2) BobCherry
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: DU (2) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (0) Cary Renquist
  
• American Nuclear Society Meeting on Davi (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: DU (0) Philippe Duport
  
• RE: DU (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (0) Cary Renquist
  
• RE: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: DU (2) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: DU (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: DU (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: DU (1) BobCherry
  
• Fwd: No effect Found for RF Radiation (a (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: DU (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (2) Borisky, Michael (Civ, ARL/CoS)
  
• Re: (0) John Jacobus
  
• UNSUBSCRIBE radsafe Inseok Baek <IBaek@r (0) Majordomo
  
• Life span and low dose rate gamma exposu (0) niton
  
• Radium Article in Florida paper (1) Stewart Farber
  
• RE: Life span and low dose rate gamma ex (0) North, David
  
• DU (1) Rick Haaker, CHP, CIH
  
• Re: DU (0) John Jacobus
  
• HAZWRAP (0) Larry Boing
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) (0) Jaro
  
• Re: DU suitcase shipment (reply) (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: (no subject) (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: DU suitcase shipment (reply) (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Radium Article in Florida paper (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: (no subject) (1) LNMolino
  
• " New U.S. border checks find radioactiv (0) Jaro
  
• Feedback - Radioactive isotope missing i (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: (no subject) (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Laymans questions on hormesis and LN (0) John Jacobus
  
• WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTICE!!! (0) Van Dyke
  
• resources (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Laymans questions on hormesis and LN (0) John Jacobus
  
• No Subject (1) neildm
  
• Radium article (1) rurban
  
• Re: Radium article (1) JOHN.RICH
  
• Cutler (0) Gary Howard
  
• Re: (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radium article (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Laymans questions on hormesis and LN (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radium article (1) BobCherry
  
• RE: Laymans questions on hormesis and LN (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radium article (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Radium article (0) DWard67262
  
• RE: Four Non-HPs vs One HP radium articl (0) rurban
  
• RE: Radium article (1) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: Radium article (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Ca/Zn-DTPA Cleared by FDA (1) Carol Marcus
  
• Re: Radium article (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: Four Non-HPs vs One HP radium articl (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Radium article (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Radium article (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Ca/Zn-DTPA Cleared by FDA (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Radium article (1) Todd Brautigam
  
• Re: Radium article (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Radium article (0) Stewart Smith
  
• Re: Ca/Zn-DTPA Cleared by FDA (0) Carol Marcus
  
• November 2003 HP Journal TOC (0) HPbabusby
  
• Article on radiation fear and disaster r (0) John Jacobus
  
• Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses (1) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Radium article (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses (0) Flood, John
  
• Employment Opportunity (0) Ronald Reif
  
• RE: Article on radiation fear and disast (1) Jaro
  
• Re: Radium article (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (2) Jaro
  
• Re: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) maury
  
• Re: Article on radiation fear and disast (1) BLHamrick
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (2) Kent, Michael D.
  
• RE: Article on radiation fear and disast (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Varian x-ray tube (0) Jeremiah Sauber
  
• Re: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (1) LNMolino
  
• RE: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) John Jacobus
  
• Electron Microscopes and E-beam welders/ (0) Jay Beckel
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (1) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Strotium-90 Eye Applicators (0) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Position Announcement for Radiation Safe (0) Gayle Mathews
  
• Anthrax terrorist (1) Doug Aitken
  
• Reminder... SCCHPS Meeting - Thursday, S (0) Tosh Ushino
  
• Re: Anthrax terrorist (1) John Jacobus
  
• Ni-63 Smoke Detectors (1) EMCTGA
  
• Article: UN atomic watchdog steps up eff (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Anthrax terrorist (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Contact for INEL dosimetry records (0) james.g.barnes
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Ni-63 Smoke Detectors (0) maury
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (1) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: Article: UN atomic watchdog steps up (0) maury
  
• Re: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Article on radiation fear and disast (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) Jaro
  
• RE: Contact for INEL dosimetry records (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Article: UN atomic watchdog steps up (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• WashPost OpEd (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: WashPost OpEd (0) BLHamrick
  
• If you do Science, use the Scientific Me (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (2) Peter.Thomas
  
• Re-analysis of Cohen's ecologic radon st (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Kinetics toolbox (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• HPS Journal full text on the web (1) Wesley
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (3) Hall, David A.
  
• Re: Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: WashPost OpEd (0) Stanley E. Logan
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (2) William V Lipton
  
• Re: HPS Journal full text on the web (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: [riskanal] RE: If you do Science, us (0) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Fritz A. Seiler
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) John Jacobus
  
• OREX PPE (0) Jeff Eichorst
  
• RE: kinetics toolbox (0) Rick Haaker, CHP, CIH
  
• Response to Ted Rockwell's article (2) John Jacobus
  
• (Fwd) RE: HPS Journal full text on the w (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Four Non-HPs Against One Health Phys (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: OREX PPE (0) Jeff Eichorst
  
• RE: Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses[Sc (1) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) William V Lipton
  
• report finds radium raises risk of bone (2) Norm Cohen
  
• Re: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (1) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: Re-analysis of Cohen's ecologic rado (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (1) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (1) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (0) John Jacobus
  
• Response to WashPost ltr (2) Ted Rockwell
  
• RE: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (1) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: Cohen's ecologic study reanalyses[Sc (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: DU suitcase shipment (reply) - "radi (0) Jaro
  
• RE: report finds radium raises risk of b (0) Jaro
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• The important question is health benefit (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (0) niton
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (2) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Mike Fox
  
• If you do Science, use the Scientific Me (1) Gary Howard
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Charles Pennington
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (0) Peter Fear
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (2) S. Fred Singer
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Joseph L. Alvarez
  
• RE: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: report finds radium raises risk of b (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (3) Charles Pennington
  
• RE: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: report find radium raises risk of b (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Response to WashPost ltr (0) yuan-chi luan
  
• "South Africa looks to next-generation n (0) William V Lipton
  
• If you do Science, use the Scientific Me (1) Johansen, Kjell
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Joseph L. Alvarez
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (3) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (0) S. Fred Singer
  
• Re: Response to WashPost ltr (0) Charles Pennington
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• HP Position Opening at Texas Bureau of R (0) Glenn Corbin
  
• Re: report find radium raises risk of b (1) Gerald Nicholls
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: "Nukalert" for first responders? (0) hflong
  
• RE: report find radium raises risk of bo (0) Jaro
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) John Jacobus
  
• RE: report find radium raises risk of bo (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• Science and LNT (0) niton
  
• Science and LNT (0) niton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) BLHamrick
  
• I disagree with "... we don't know what (0) John Cameron
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: report find radium raises risk of bo (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Steven Dapra
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Ted Rockwell
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (2) William V Lipton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Howard Long
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Response to Ted Rockwell's article (0) Howard Long
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• LNT,cabbages and kings (1) Bill Prestwich
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) Hall, David A.
  
• RE: report find radium raises risk of bo (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Bob Hearn
  
• Attitude to 'Risky' Treatment (0) Chris Davey
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Attitude to 'Risky' Treatment (1) Muckerheide, Jim (CDA)
  
• Coming to an Activists' Rally Near You! (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Howard Long
  
• Re: [MbrExchange] RE: Attitude to 'Risky (0) AtomicRod
  
• Re: LNT,cabbages and kings (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (2) Steven Dapra
  
• Military Health Physics (1) BobCherry
  
• Re: Military Health Physics (0) BLHamrick
  
• MRI Injection (1) Tedchp
  
• RE: Military Health Physics (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Canberra Series 90 Variant (0) Richard Hester
  
• Re: Military Health Physics (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: LNT,cabbages and kings (0) jjcohen
  
• Re: LNT,cabbages and kings (0) William V Lipton
  
• Science and LNT (2) niton
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: Attitude to 'Risky' Treatment (0) Howard Long
  
• RE: Attitude to 'Risky' Treatment (0) Muckerheide, Jim (CDA)
  
• Re: MRI Injection (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: Attitude to 'Risky' Treatment (0) Jim Muckerheide
  
• re: MRI Injection (0) Michael J Vala
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: MRI Injection (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: MRI Injection (0) John Jacobus
  
• Unidentified device (1) Todd Brautigam
  
• Re: Military Health Physics (1) EMCTGA
  
• Re: Military Health Physics (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) jjcohen
  
• RE: Unidentified device (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: Unidentified device (1) Flood, John
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Bicron Instrument Catalog (1) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: Bicron Instrument Catalog (1) Sandy Perle
  
• First Responders (2) ray ilson
  
• Re: Bicron Instrument Catalog (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Unidentified device (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: If you do Science, use the Scientifi (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Unidentified device (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: LNT,cabbages and kings (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Unidentified device (0) Stewart Farber
  
• Re: Unidentified device (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: First Responders (0) M Nivas
  
• Re: Unidentified device (0) Todd Brautigam
  
• RE: Bicron Instrument Catalog (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Science and LNT (1) Howard Long
  
• RE: Unidentified device (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• RE: Bicron Instrument Catalog (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Science and LNT (1) John Jacobus
  
• Submitting comments on rulemakings (1) Bradt, Clayton
  
• FirstEnergy sees Ohio nuke restarting so (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Nuclear Workers Complain About Cleanup (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Unidentified device (0) Conklin, Al
  
• Shielding cyc. penetrations (0) Hill, Eric D
  
• RE: Bicron Instrument Catalog (0) Humphrey, Monica M.
  
• Re: Submitting comments on rulemakings (0) John Jacobus
  
• Article: Anti-Nuclear Pioneer Plots a (0) John Jacobus
  
• Bicron URL; Thanks for help (0) james.g.barnes
  
• RE: Bicron Instrument Catalog (0) alstonchris
  
• RE: Attitude to 'Risky' Treatment (0) yuan-chi luan
  
• Re: First Responders (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Shielding cyc. penetrations (0) JPreisig
  
• Re: Science and LNT (2) Howard Long
  
• Re: First Responders / Evacuation Areas (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• (no subject) (1) RuthWeiner
  
• "Security Fee May Be Needed For Maritime (0) Jaro
  
• "Department of Homeland Security (DHS) i (1) Jaro
  
• Envirocare Contact/Info (1) Tedchp
  
• Landauer's Luxel Dosimetry badge (1) Kevin_Messer
  
• RE: Unidentified device (0) Kolb, William (WKOLB)
  
• U.S. Maritime Security Expo (0) Susan McElrath
  
• Re: Science and LNT (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: (no subject) (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: "Department of Homeland Security (DH (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Science and LNT (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Landauer's Luxel Dosimetry badge (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• N13.32 status Power Point presentation U (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Science and LNT (0) jjcohen
  
• Funding requests for Homeland Security R (0) John Jacobus
  
• Rad Safe Blood Irradiator (3) Smith, Laura T. (Physics)
  
• My appointment (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Rad Safe Blood Irradiator (0) maury
  
• Re: My appointment (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Rad Safe Blood Irradiator (0) John Jacobus
  
• Significance of the ICRPs Updated Guidan (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Rad Safe Blood Irradiator (0) Bob Westerdale
  
• RE: Rad Source Blood Irradiator (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: Landauer's Luxel Dosimetry badge (0) Kim Kearfott
  
• Scientist plants radioactive material in (0) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: report find radium raises risk of bo (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: report find radium raises risk of bo (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• RE: My appointment (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Alpha-Beta Emitters for fluorescence (2) Nisy Ipe
  
• Conference Announcement (0) Nisy Ipe
  
• Health Physics Positions -- San Francisc (0) Dan Hoffman
  
• RE: Alpha-Beta Emitters for fluorescence (0) Wesley
  
• time course of iodine in saliva (0) Marissa Bartlett
  
• Re: 200 mSv, excessive radiation of work (0) yuan-chi luan
  
• RE: Alpha-Beta Emitters for fluorescence (0) Chuck Cooper
  
• Re: Rad Safe Blood Irradiator (0) garyi
  
• RE: Envirocare Contact/Info (0) Charlie Migliore
  
• Re: Alpha-Beta Emitters for fluorescence (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: SF Gate: Superbomb ignites science d (0) William V Lipton
  
• Neb. utility safely stores atomic fuel a (0) Sandy Perle
  
• trading or buying old ICRP publications (0) Rick Haaker, CHP, CIH
  
• Re: My appointment (0) BLHamrick
  
• Radioactive package seized (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: Radioactive package seized (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Radioactive package seized (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: My appointment (0) Flanigan, Floyd