[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Hanford Site Cleanup Standards and CERCLA
Here is what I got on CERCLA liability from the U. S. Code web page
42 US Code Chapter 103 Sec 9607 - Liability
(a) Covered persons; scope; recoverable costs and damages...
(3)any person who by contract, agreement, or otherwise arranged for disposal or treatment...of hazardous substances...at any facility....
(4)....shall be liable for -
(A) ALL COSTS OF REMOVAL OR REMEDIAL ACTION INCURRED BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT....
(emphasis mine)
Hanford IS the United States Government, so CERCLA liability clearly does not apply.
Furthermore, Section (b)(3) exempts contractors from liability, and (b)(3)(A) exempts anyone who exercised due care with respect to the hazardous substances concerned "in light of all relevant facts and circumstances"
So even if CERCLA applied to Hanford contractors, they would not be liable because they did exercise care in light of the relevant facts at the time (or in any case, one would be hard pressed to prove, 30 to 50 years later, that they didn't). The Congressional framers of CERCLA did not expect 20/20 foresight.
Ruth
--
Ruth F. Weiner
ruthweiner@aol.com
505-856-5011
(o)505-284-8406
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/