[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: My appointment
I am encouraged that the bureaucracy, NRC, has the wisdom to pick Ruth Weiner, one well known to ignore tradition (LNT) where it does not fit scientific information.
I pray you may also bring NRC the two-tailed test for all risk analysis (my concern with John Jacobus).
John Cameron blames the harm-only analysis of NSYWS for delay in publicizing finding of just 0.76 total mortality among recipients of an extra 0.5 rad vs controls.
Persist. I just had headlined in Cortlandt Forum, read by most MDs, (others will now persist):
"Even without statistical analysis, it is obvious that never-smokers on HRT should have had much less CV disaease."
Howard Long MD MPH
----- Original Message -----
From: BLHamrick@AOL.COM
To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM ; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: My appointment
In a message dated 9/29/2003 10:34:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, RuthWeiner@AOL.COM writes:
Thanks very much, everyone, for the good wishes and congratulations you have sent regarding my appointment to ACNW. And please let's keep up the lively discussions on RADSAFE -- I get a lot of stuff I can use.
Congratulations, Ruth!!! And, I don't think you need worry about prodding more lively discussions here. We seem to prod ourselves quite well, so to speak.
Barbara