RadSafe Archive Mail Index October, 2003

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Re: Radioactive package seized (0) William V Lipton
  
• ICN Pharmaceuticals Announces Sale of Do (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Scientist plants radioactive materia (1) John Jacobus
  
• Questionable Programs (0) neildm
  
• How Congress controls DOE, etc. (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Questionable Programs (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Unusual Radiological Concerns with Neutr (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Programs (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Radioactive package seized (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Scientist plants radioactive materia (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• RE: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (2) Jaro
  
• RE: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• RE: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: DOE Facilities - Radioactive Materia (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Health Physicist Position - Bethesda, MD (0) Greg Johnson
  
• Spray-on coating detects and removes rad (0) Brich, Randall F
  
• Re: Dept. of Homeland Security S&T Progr (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Neutron Source Design for Boron Neutron (0) John Jacobus
  
• A query for radsafe on health risk of me (1) Sonter Mark
  
• Check out 10/02: AOL News: FDA OKs Anti (0) LancerGT
  
• MARLAP (0) Brian Keele
  
• CBI Announces its Nuclear Power Outlook (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: A query for radsafe on health risk o (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• text version :10/02: AOL News: FDA OKs A (0) LancerGT
  
• Electron beam resources (0) Kim D. Merritt
  
• RE: Electron beam resources (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Electron beam resources (0) Nisy Ipe
  
• Articles on Radiation and Longevity (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Auger (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• job posting (0) Thomas Pauer
  
• Rad Engineer/Health Physicist Positions (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Gamma Spec - Rad Engineer Needed for Oak (0) Stephanie Long
  
• Radiation Protection Dosimetry (0) E.P.Goldfinch
  
• RE: Electron beam resources (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• 254 received excess radiation in treatme (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Sensorcoat decontamination coating (1) JGinniver
  
• Panasonic TLD irradiator (0) Neill Stanford
  
• a dose query (0) Sonter Mark
  
• IAEA Conference: Radioprotection of the (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: a dose query (1) Peter.Thomas
  
• Just another dose query (0) Frank Helk
  
• Re: IAEA Conference: Radioprotection of (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: Sensorcoat decontamination coating (1) John Kuperus
  
• RE: Sensorcoat decontamination coating (1) Larry Boing
  
• Activity Limits for Use of Radionuclides (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• RE: Sensorcoat decontamination coating (0) John Kuperus
  
• RE: Sensorcoat decontamination coating (1) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Sensorcoat decontamination coating (0) John Kuperus
  
• Do you want the FEMLAB Tour CD? (0) Tony Ching
  
• North Korea says it bars Japan from nucl (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Request for Information (0) Voss, Shannon P LT (CNAL N01M3)
  
• CORPEX (1) Larry Boing
  
• Re: a dose query (0) JGinniver
  
• (Fwd) Border gamma-xray devices (1) Jones, Pauline
  
• DandD code (0) Cehn
  
• Are nukes making you fat? (2) Norm Cohen
  
• "Slow going on MAPLE" (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: (Fwd) Border gamma-xray devices (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: Are nukes making you fat? (1) Glenn Marshall
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (1) Norm Cohen
  
• RE: (Fwd) Border gamma-xray devices (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• RE: Are nukes making you fat? (0) Neil, David M
  
• RE: Are nukes making you fat? (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (0) Ralph M. Becker
  
• No decision on new French nuclear reacto (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Are nukes making you fat? -- worth r (0) Jaro
  
• Field Radiography Instructions/Procedure (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (1) jjcohen
  
• Re: CORPEX (0) maury
  
• RE: Field Radiography Instructions/Proce (0) ANDERSON Linda(L) - BRUCE POWER
  
• Contract Employment Opportunity (0) OFFTOWY
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (0) Steven Dapra
  
• RE: Are nukes making you fat? (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: My appointment (0) Howard Long
  
• RE: (Fwd) Border gamma-xray devices (0) Humphrey, Monica M.
  
• RE: Are nukes making you fat? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Are nukes making you fat? (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: (Fwd) Border gamma-xray devices (0) Dukelow, James S Jr
  
• New disease to keep track of: Hutchison' (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: IAEA Conference: Radioprotection of (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: IAEA Conference: Radioprotection of (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• WG: US ARMY (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: US ARMY (It's the 419 Scam model) (2) James Barnes
  
• Re: WG: US ARMY (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Subject: Re: US ARMY (It's the 419 Scam (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: US ARMY (It's the 419 Scam model) (0) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: WG: US ARMY (0) RuthWeiner
  
• ANS Meeting (0) William V Lipton
  
• Franz's scam letter posted (0) Johansen, Kjell
  
• [Fwd: ANS Meeting] (0) William V Lipton
  
• scams and spams (2) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Franz's scam letter posted (0) Nathan, Steve
  
• Radioactive Tracers (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: scams and spams (0) Kai Kaletsch
  
• Re: scams and spams (0) Sandra
  
• Doctors and Rad. Doses (0) Estabrooks, Bates (IHK)
  
• Re: scams and spams (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: scams and spams (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Radioactive Tracers (0) NSSIHOU
  
• New spam/scam message (1) M Nivas
  
• Re: New spam/scam message (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: New spam/scam message (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: New spam/scam message (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Radioactive Tracers (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• NUREG-1140 (0) Whitaker, Todd
  
• U.S. DOT RSPA Federal Register Notice (0) Williams, James
  
• Fwd: Doctors and Rad. DosesFwd: Doctors (0) JGinniver
  
• Radon Education or Hype? (0) Gary Howard
  
• Re: scams and spams (1) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: Radon Education or Hype? (0) Neil, David M
  
• RADSAFE, scams and spams (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: New spam/scam message (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Metastron (0) Engelbretson, David A.
  
• Re: Radon Education or Hype? (0) RuthWeiner
  
• We love wind -- or do we? (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (0) BobCherry
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (1) Joan Stovall
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• RE: RADSAFE, scams and spams (0) Dr Christoph Hofmeyr
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (1) Mountain Himalaya
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Radon Education or Hype? (1) Celia Rajkovich, RRPT
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (1) Bob Hearn
  
• Conference Announcement (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Re: Radon Education or Hype? (1) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: Radon Education or Hype? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (2) Mountain Himalaya
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Identities - list policy (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Fwd: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Mountain Himalaya
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Flood, John
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Mountain Himalaya
  
• No wind in my backyard.... (0) Vincent King
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Mountain Himalaya
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Flood, John
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Jaro
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (1) Mountain Himalaya
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (0) Vincent King
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (2) Mountain Himalaya
  
• Vet Radiology and Nuclear Medicine ALARA (0) Lorna Hubble
  
• Gamma spectra of spent fuel (0) Brian Rees
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (0) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) John R Johnson
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (2) Vincent King
  
• ANO Unit 2 Sets Refueling Outage Records (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (0) Ted de Castro
  
• No Subject (1) JOHN.RICH
  
• Re: No wind in my backyard.... (0) maury
  
• Fuel Cycle Facilities Forum (0) Larry Boing
  
• Re: (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• No Subject (1) vw 181
  
• Fwd: RE: radioactive porcelain (0) vw 181
  
• Fwd: Re: RE: radioactive porcelain (0) vw 181
  
• RE: (0) NIXON, Grant (Kanata)
  
• "Is There a Future for Nuclear Energy in (0) Jaro
  
• AW: (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: We love wind -- or do we? (1) Jim Hoerner
  
• RE: (0) John R Johnson
  
• RE: We love wind -- or do we? (0) Richard Orthen
  
• Archive DVD (0) E.P.Goldfinch
  
• RE: Radioactive Tracers (0) BRISSON Nicolas
  
• McMaster rebuts report of nuclear theft (0) Jaro
  
• "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) William V Lipton
  
• TVO selected Olkiluoto-site for the new (0) LassePer
  
• Protective Clothing (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Small Radioactive Exposure At Coal-fired (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Swedish study identifies a major source (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) RuthWeiner
  
• New Report on A-Bomb Survivor Mortality (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Jocelyn Kaiser "Science" reports on (0) Ted Rockwell
  
• DOE Contacts to Convert Legacy Material (0) John Jacobus
  
• WMD counter-terrorism: "Czech Republic a (0) Jaro
  
• Thanks for Info regarding coveralls (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Research shows higher cancer risk for fl (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Workloads for Multi-Slice CT scanners (0) Nisy Ipe
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (1) BLHamrick
  
• Research Shows Higher Cancer Risk for Fl (0) Susan McElrath
  
• Dutch (TNO) mobile phone study misinterp (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Employment Opportunity (0) juetm
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (1) jjcohen
  
• RE: Political wranglings over WIPP (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• Village invited to test cheap, clean nuc (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Political wranglings over WIPP (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (1) Steven Dapra
  
• RE: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) George J. Vargo
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) William V Lipton
  
• Fw: Mazeless rooms in radiotherapy (0) yehoshua kalish
  
• Re: Political wranglings over WIPP (1) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) EMCTGA
  
• Airline personnel (1) William Prestwich
  
• RE: "Political wranglings over WIPP" (0) William Prestwich
  
• RE: Political wranglings over WIPP (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Political wranglings over WIPP (1) RuthWeiner
  
• responses (0) William Prestwich
  
• Re: Airline personnel (2) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Airline personnel (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Political wranglings over WIPP (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Airline personnel (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• Airline Personnel and Melanoma (0) alstonchris
  
• Re: U.S. seeks license to ship plutoniu (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Article: Radioactive waste falls from tr (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Illegal export of radioactive material t (0) John Jacobus
  
• UW's DeLuca defends nuclear power (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Answer to "Waste" question (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• A "dirty bomb" question (5) LNMolino
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) maury
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) High Plains Drifter
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) LNMolino
  
• Re: Article: Radioactive waste falls fro (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re:An alarming fact! (0) jjcohen
  
• RE: A "dirty bomb" question (1) Jaro
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (0) LNMolino
  
• AW: A "dirty bomb" question (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (0) LNMolino
  
• OT: U. of Tennessee NE Dept. Colloquium (0) Ledbetter, Cynthia M.
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Interesting presentation on radiaion acc (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) RuthWeiner
  
• IRC International Poster Session; Reques (0) James Barnes
  
• AW: ?subject?, ?name?, ?affiliation?, ?p (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (2) LNMolino
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) John Jacobus
  
• Position Opening (0) Louie Cueva
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) LNMolino
  
• AW: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: A "dirty bomb" question (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) LNMolino
  
• A "dirty bomb" question (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: Interesting presentation on radiaion (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) Thomas M Lashley
  
• Position Announcements (0) Hart, Diana
  
• Whole Body Counting (0) gammatron inc
  
• lead glass supplier needed (0) Ledbetter, Cynthia M.
  
• Woman in Boat (0) Miller, Mark L
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb (0) Catherine Perham
  
• Electron Microscopes Available (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) EMCTGA
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (2) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• FW: HP opening (0) Farrell, Linda M.
  
• RE: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• California (0) William Prestwich
  
• Radiation Safety Specialist Position (0) Tracy Tipping
  
• AW: A "dirty bomb" question (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free Rele (2) Goff, Tom
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Dirty Bonbs & Radiophobia (1) jjcohen
  
• RE: A "dirty bomb" question (0) John R Johnson
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Richard Orthen
  
• Re: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: California (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Goff, Tom
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (1) Dimiter Popoff
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Williamson, Matthew/Medical Physics
  
• RE: A "dirty bomb" question (0) Jaro
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (2) LNMolino
  
• Re: A "dirty bomb" question (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (2) EMCTGA
  
• AW: Dirty Bomb (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (2) Michael McNaughton
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: AW: Dirty Bomb (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Dirty Bonbs & Radiophobia (1) BLHamrick
  
• Starting early (0) Steven Dapra
  
• I need a paper by McGinley (0) kongchaocheng
  
• I need a paper (0) kongchaocheng
  
• RE: Dirty Bomb (0) George J. Vargo
  
• Dirty Bomb - Limitation of occupational (1) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• AURORA SHUD BE VISIBLE OVER ENTIRE US TO (0) maury
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (1) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: Dirty Bonbs & Radiophobia (0) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (1) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: Dirty Bombs & Radiophobia (1) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Re: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Goff, Tom
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (0) Sam Iverstine
  
• Solar Flares and Rad Instruments (0) Goff, Tom
  
• 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) MacLellan, Jay
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: Dirty Bombs & Radiophobia (0) jjcohen
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb - Limitation of occupatio (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• RE: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (0) Ledbetter, Cynthia M.
  
• Re: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (1) BLHamrick
  
• Fwd: RE: California (0) Richard L. Hess
  
• Re: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Goff, Tom
  
• Second request for posting on Radsafe fo (0) gammatron inc
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (2) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free (0) Redmond, Randy (RXQ)
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (0) WBrunkowConsult
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (1) BERNARD L COHEN
  
• Two meetings in the DC area: Speaker is (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Dirty Bonbs & Radiophobia (0) jjcohen
  
• Re: Dirty Bomb (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: 60 minutes - Yucca Mountain (0) John Jacobus
  
• cosmic rays and Forbush effect (0) Michael McNaughton
  
• Errata for Moe Manual (1) alstonchris
  
• Re: Errata for Moe Manual (0) John Jacobus
  
• WG:a question (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• 226 Radium Inquiry (0) M�nica Basanta
  
• No sternum (1) Glenn and Rita Marshall
  
• Re: No sternum (0) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Regional Congress in Lima, Peru (0) Jose Julio Rozental