[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MDA vs. Critical level for DOE Free Release surveys



You have to use both concepts.  Briefly:



The critical level is an after the fact decision point: Is the count due to

radioactive contamination or is it variation in background, i.e., can the

material be free released?  This is usually set to provide for 5% "Type 1"

error; i.e. there's a 5% chance of a false positive.



The MDA is an a priori evaluation of your assay system.  It is set so that, for

a sample which contains an MDA of contamination, the actual count will exceed

the critical level with 95% confidence, i.e., a 5% "Type 2" (false negative)

error.



I believe that Glenn Knowles's book has a good explanation of this.



The opinions expressed are strictly mine.

It's not about dose, it's about trust.

Curies forever.



Bill Lipton

liptonw@dteenergy.com





"Goff, Tom" wrote:



> >       Title:

> >

> >       We are discussing using a critical level for free release surveys.

> > Please provide answers to the following:

> >

> >       Are you using critical value or MDA for free release surveys of

> > materials from your site?

> >

> >       Does anyone have a reference/regulatory standard on whether to use

> > MDA or critical value for free release surveys?

> >

> >       Given that an MDA results in a 95% confidence in detecting

> > contamination at the MDA value, what is the corresponding confidence if

> > using the critical level?

> >

> >       I would welcome any other comments or thoughts on this.

> >

> >       Tom Goff

> >

> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------

> > ----------------------------------------------------------------

> >       Let me know if you're ok with this.

> >

> >

> >

> >       Tom Goff

> >       WIPP ALARA Coordinator

> >       WIPP Integrated Waste Operations

> >       (505) 234-8861

> >       (fax)  234-8963

> >       e-mail  Tom.Goff@WIPP.ws

> >       page (505) 234-8850  (pager 479)

> >       P.O. Box 2078

> >       Carlsbad, NM 88221

> >       Radiological Engineering: Anticipating Problems.....providing

> > solutions!!!

> >

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/