[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A "dirty bomb" question



In a message dated 10/27/2003 6:52:46 AM Central Standard Time, 

liptonw@dteenergy.com writes:

This sounds suspiciously like, "Perception is reality."  Telling people that 

there's no danger for ALMOST [emphasis mine] all scenarios is NOT reassuring. 

Frankly it's more the Education Via the Boob Tube problem.



Many responders have NO formal RAD training, what RAD they do have may have 

come out of the cold war era, many are only equipped with the CDV-700 series 

instrumentation that as designed for use in a post atomic detonation 

environment. Therefore they don't have anymore real knowledge than your average citizen. 

You have all discussed the shortfalls in the education of the public, 

responders are at best a notch above on a global scale.



I consider myself to be fairly well educated in this area as far as 

responders go and I am woefully ignorant.



Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET

FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI

LNMolino@aol.com

979-690-3607 (Home Office)

979-458-0795 (Fire Field Office)



"A Texan with a Jersey Attitude"



The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the 

author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization 

that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I 

specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for it's 

stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials 

retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public 

domain by the original author.