[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A "dirty bomb" question
In a message dated 10/27/2003 12:47:05 PM Central Standard Time, 
RuthWeiner@AOL.COM writes:
As I also said (which was ignored) that I can't think of a "dirty bomb" 
scenario that would cause sufficient harm to cause panic.  And I absolutely can't 
think of a situation that is helped by panic.
My entire point is that not one person need be harmed to cause the panic and 
that the panic in and of itself could be seen as a terrorist event.
Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET
FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI
LNMolino@aol.com
979-690-3607 (Home Office)
979-458-0795 (Fire Field Office)
"A Texan with a Jersey Attitude"
The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the author and the 
author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or organization 
that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless I 
specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only for it's 
stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials 
retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public 
domain by the original author.