[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dirty Bomb
The problem with using exposures to populations in
Iran, Brazil, etc. is that the exposures are
protracted. First reponders will be receiving an
accute exposure. I would prefer quoting the position
paper of the HPS:
http://hps.org/documents/radiationrisk.pdf
--- RadSafeInst <RadSafeInst@cableone.net> wrote:
> I liked Richard's answer to Mr. Molino. Let's
> compare responder doses to those the people in
> Kerala, India or Ramsar, Iran (and a couple of
> places in Brazil and China that I forget) receive
> without any apparent harmful effects. They are 10 to
> 25 times higher than our average of about 360mR.
> Furthermore, in guidance from the EPA it is stated
> that Responders might expect doses of 5 Rem in a
> typical incident (10 if protecting valuable
> property, and 25 if life-saving). It is doubtful
> that a terrorist could ever produce such doses with
> a dirty bomb made from something Am-241) so hard to
> vaporize or to suspend in the atmosphere for any
> significant time.
>
>
> Ed Battle
>
=====
+++++++++++++++++++
"It had been understood by Cleon, who, in the fifth century B.C., had reminded the citizens of another imperial power, Athens, that 'a democracy is incapable of empire.'"
James Lawrence, during the War of 1812
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/