[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HP Positions

To: William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM>, Sandy Perle <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>
Subject: Re: HP Positions
From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:58:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:00:17 -0600
Cc: RADSAFE@list.vanderbilt.edu, "Stabin, Michael" <michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3FA93CC1.7DF88134@dteenergy.com>

We recently had an NRC inspection of our license. 

According to one of the inspectors, few programs have

changed as a result of the revision to 10 CFR 35,

which deals with the use of NRC licensed material in

medicine.  The medical community has essentially

stayed with what works.  



I wonder if things changed in the operation of nuclear

power plants if  the regulations changed.  Any

comments?





--- William V Lipton <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM> wrote:

> I agree with both Sandy and Mike, but one thing

> comes to mind:  I'm always

> seeing messages, on Radsafe, from medical hp's

> calling for an end to NRC

> regulation of medical radionuclide use.  It seems

> that we're sometimes our

> own worst enemies.

> 







=====

+++++++++++++++++++

"One test result is worth one thousand expert opinions."

Wernher von Braun



-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com



__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard

http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree

Follow-Ups:
- Re: HP Positions
  - From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@earthlink.net>

References:
- Re: HP Positions
  - From: William V Lipton <liptonw@dteenergy.com>

Prev by Date: Nuclear waste reprocessing cost estimated at 22 tril. yen+
Next by Date: Re: HP Positions
Prev by thread: Re: HP Positions
Next by thread: Re: HP Positions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread