[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tooth Fairy (Project) Comes to Hackensack University Medical Center



It's often worthwhile to look for the unexpected.  Nuclear power plants are required

to have a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, even when effluent monitor

results show that there's no possibility of finding anything.



Virtually all research is undertaken in an attempt to prove a hypothesis.



The opinions expressed ares strictly mine.

It's not about dose, it's about trust.

Curies forever.



Bill Lipton

liptonw@dteenergy.com





Steven Dapra wrote:



> Nov. 15

>

>         Bill Lipton wrote:

>

>         "While I don't necessarily agree with either the purpose or goals of the

> "Tooth Fairy Project," I am most disappointed in the responses I've seen on

> Radsafe.  They seem to consist primarily of attacks on the motivations and

> competence of those involved, rather than any semi-professional evaluation

> of the work or the issues.  It seems that anyone who disagrees with 'the

> party line' is attacked as biased or incompetent.

>

>         "This knee jerk response does a great disservice to all of us.

>

>         "At this point, the TSP seems to be in a data collecting stage.  Some

> recommendations regarding methodology may be in order, but, regardless of

> the motivations of the project participants, they deserve the right to

> present their views."

>

> My Comments:

>

>         The motivation of the Tooth Fairy Project (TFP) is to gather "evidence" to

> support its agenda of shutting down power reactors.  If that is not the

> TPF's motivation (Bill), what is its motivation?

>

>         Stewart Farber very aptly pointed out the following:

>

>         " . . . the routine emissions of Sr-90 from any nuclear power plant are

> insufficient to even maintain the existing environmental inventory of Sr-90

> in the terrestrial or aquatic environment from earlier bomb test fallout in

> the 1960s, never mind increase exposure to any person living in the

> vicinity.  Each year the megacuries of Sr-90 which remain in the

> environment from open air testing of nuclear weapons by the US and the

> Soviets which ended in 1963, decay by an amount that far exceeds the sum of

> all emissions from US nuclear power plants in the present or anytime in the

> past.

>

>         " . . . [edit] . . . Releases from today's nuclear plant operations CANNOT

> KEEP THE CURRENT SR-90 environmental inventory constant never mind increase

> overall exposure from Sr-90.

>

>         "The basic premise of the Tooth Fairy project that a few micro-Ci or

> milli-Ci of Sr-90 release per year from any one nuclear power plant is

> increasing Sr-90 exposure and cancer risk to children in the general

> environment near a facility today, given the much, much greater [but still

> trivial] amount of Sr-90 in the environment and diet from residual Sr-90 in

> the environment from prior bomb test fallout, is simply absurd,

> unscientific, and a fraud intended to promote an anti-nuclear agenda.

>

>         Assuming that all this is true, and I suspect that it is, it seems to me

> that RADSAFEers who are doing so would be remiss in <not> attacking the

> competence of the TFP.

>

>         Bank robbers, car thieves, and people who support the legalization of

> drugs also "deserve the right to present their views," but those of us who

> know better should be prompt to point out in no uncertain terms that such

> views are nonsense.

>

>         I also endorse Jerry Cohen's Nov. 14 suggestion to Bill Lipton:  " . . .

> perhaps you might offer a technically feasible explanation of how Sr-90 in

> children's teeth might conceivably be indicative of releases from nuclear

> power plants, particularly in light of  Sr-90 levels in global fallout.

> Absent such a reasonable explanation, why would it matter what methods are

> used to assess Sr-90 levels in children's teeth?"

>

> Steven Dapra

> sjd@swcp.com

>

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/