[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Head injury X-rays may actually be causing harm
The Times reports:- January 02, 2004
Head injury X-rays may actually be causing harm
By Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,174-949184,00.html
A BANG on the head may do less harm than the X-rays used to diagnose the
degree of damage, a study suggests.
In research that is likely to have a significant effect on how children with
minor head injuries are treated, Swedish scientists have shown that even low
doses of radiation can impair intellectual development.
The doses involved are typical of those used in CT scans, which may
sometimes be done to check if there is any damage after a bump on the head.
The authors of the research say that CT scanning after minor head trauma now
needs to be reconsidered.
A team from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, with colleagues in
Harvard and Athens, followed up more than 3,000 men who had been given
radiation treatment for haemangioma, an excessive growth of blood vessels in
the skin, which includes “strawberry marks”.
Such marks often occur in babies, and 80 per cent are on the head and neck.
They normally disappear within a few years but sometimes require treatment
by laser or surgery.
But in the past, low-intensity radiation was used in the form of X-rays. The
team, led by Dr Per Hall, examined the educational level achieved by 3,094
men treated in this way between 1930 and 1959.
They report in the British Medical Journal that the more radiation the boys
were given before the age of 18 months, the lower their subsequent
intellectual level. Those given the highest doses were about half as likely
to attend high school and scored less well on intelligence tests given when
they were called up for national service at 18.
Link to BMJ
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/328/7430/19
http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7430/19
Treatment to the front of the skull tended to have greater effects than to
the back because more critical parts of the brain are towards the front.
The team points out that the radiation levels experienced during CT scans
are similar to those found to have caused the damage. So although other
therapies have replaced radiation for treating strawberry marks, there may
still be a risk for those scanned by X-ray computerised tomography to assess
if there is any brain damage after a bump on the head.
Scanning is not normally recommended but clinical practice “dictated by
legal and financial considerations does not always adhere to these
protocols”, the team writes.
“The risk and benefit of computed tomography scans in minor head trauma need
re-evaluating.”
===================================
Fred Dawson
London UK
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/