RE: Head injury X-rays may actually be causing harm

["Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers@HOTMAIL.COM>]

I attended a lecture (by the lead author) about this more than a year ago - 

the material seemed quite convincing. If nothing else it is definitely worth 

a careful analysis rather than to be rejected. It is good that the material 

finally was published.



My personal idea only,



Bjorn Cedervall   bcradsafers@hotmail.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Times reports:- January 02, 2004



Head injury X-rays may actually be causing harm



By Nigel Hawkes, Health Editor



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,174-949184,00.html





A BANG on the head may do less harm than the X-rays used to diagnose the

degree of damage, a study suggests.



In research that is likely to have a significant effect on how children with

minor head injuries are treated, Swedish scientists have shown that even low

doses of radiation can impair intellectual development.



The doses involved are typical of those used in CT scans, which may

sometimes be done to check if there is any damage after a bump on the head.

The authors of the research say that CT scanning after minor head trauma now

needs to be reconsidered.



A team from the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, with colleagues in

Harvard and Athens, followed up more than 3,000 men who had been given

radiation treatment for haemangioma, an excessive growth of blood vessels in

the skin, which includes “strawberry marks”.



Such marks often occur in babies, and 80 per cent are on the head and neck.

They normally disappear within a few years but sometimes require treatment

by laser or surgery.



But in the past, low-intensity radiation was used in the form of X-rays. The

team, led by Dr Per Hall, examined the educational level achieved by 3,094

men treated in this way between 1930 and 1959.



They report in the British Medical Journal that the more radiation the boys

were given before the age of 18 months, the lower their subsequent

intellectual level. Those given the highest doses were about half as likely

to attend high school and scored less well on intelligence tests given when

they were called up for national service at 18.



Link to BMJ

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/328/7430/19

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7430/19

Treatment to the front of the skull tended to have greater effects than to

the back because more critical parts of the brain are towards the front.



The team points out that the radiation levels experienced during CT scans

are similar to those found to have caused the damage. So although other

therapies have replaced radiation for treating strawberry marks, there may

still be a risk for those scanned by X-ray computerised tomography to assess

if there is any brain damage after a bump on the head.



Scanning is not normally recommended but clinical practice “dictated by

legal and financial considerations does not always adhere to these

  protocols”, the team writes.



“The risk and benefit of computed tomography scans in minor head trauma need

re-evaluating.”



===================================

Fred Dawson

London UK



_________________________________________________________________

Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory 

offer.  http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/