[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WIPP shipment through Albq. NM
For the benefit of all of us, I hope that you are a little more sensitive to the public's concerns when you speak at that hearing. Please don't win the battle, but lose the war.
The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
It's not about dose, it's about trust.
Curies forever.
Bill Lipton
liptonw@dteenergy.om
RuthWeiner@aol.com wrote:
> 1. There is no bypass around Albuquerque. DOT regs require that a bypass be used if it exists.
> 2. Any alternate route must by DOT regs be shown to be no more risky than the DOT preferred route (I have done several of these analyses in other cases). Any route for NTS to the WIPP that avoids Albuquerque would be considerably longer and/or use secondary roads. Any such route would entail increased risk (obviously).
>
> DOE is not stupid, nor insensitive to risk. These trucks have the same probability of accident as any heavy truck, and the incident-free doses are negligible or zero. Before taking up for the protesters all the time, why not inform yourself of the facts?
>
> Ruth
>
> --
> Ruth F. Weiner
> ruthweiner@aol.com
> 505-856-5011
> (o)505-284-8406
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To
unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the
text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,
with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at
http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/