Re: 'Dirty Bomb' Was Major New Year's Worry

["Gerry Blackwood" <gpblackwood@justice.com>]

"I would also ask what was the purpose of the article? 

To make the public feel confident that the government

was doing something useful?"



Security Theater.........



Gerry Blackwood









On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:42:19 -0800 (PST), John Jacobus

wrote:



> 

> Valid comments.

> By "First Responders" I mean those who first come to

> the scene of the accident, such as the fire department

> personnel.  A lot of units are getting (DOE surplus

> equipment) or buying meters (because they have bucks).

>  I know one local group have alpha meters in case of a

> "nuclear weapon."    

> 

> The comment about "level of experts" goes to the heart

> of my question.  What are people being trained for?  I

> would assume "first responsers" will be engaged in

> stopping the accident, e.g., fire, flooding, etc., and

> rescuing the injured.

> 

> The article that started this thread concerned experts

> going around major cities looking for radiological

> weapons.  It was unclear to me who these "experts"

> were.  Part of the NEST teams?  State or city

> radiologial control personnel?  Local police?  

> 

> I would also ask what was the purpose of the article? 

> To make the public feel confident that the government

> was doing something useful?

> 

> --- LNMolino@aol.com wrote:

> > In a message dated 1/8/2004 12:33:05 PM Central

> > Standard Time, 

> > crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM writes:

> > 

> > Can I assume that all of the first responders will

> > have the technology and 

> > expertise to properly determine the existence of a

> > "dirty bomb?"  Or will we 

> > have to wait for the experts to get here?

> > 

> > First define First Responder?

> > 

> > That definition in and of itself is mired in

> > controversy. 

> > 

> > The get to "experts" again you have "levels of

> > "experts"

> > 

> > Unless you asked that question in a specific

> > scenario based vein I am not 

> > sure of the validity of any answer to it?

> > 

> . . .

> 

> =====

> +++++++++++++++++++

> "There's no trick to being a humorist when you have

the

> whole government working for you."

> Will Rogers

> 

> -- John

> John Jacobus, MS

> Certified Health Physicist

> e-mail:  crispy_bird@yahoo.com

> 

> __________________________________

> Do you Yahoo!?

> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes

> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus

>

************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> list. To

> unsubscribe, send an e-mail to

> Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

> text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the

body

> of the e-mail,

> with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe

archives

> at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



_________________________________________________

FindLaw - Free Case Law, Jobs, Library, Community

http://www.FindLaw.com

Get your FREE @JUSTICE.COM email!

http://mail.Justice.com

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/