[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays...Montclair NJ info...



I'm not sure what you mean by "individual".  The EPA did not act alone

with regard to homes in Montclair (and neighboring Glen Ridge and West

Orange).  The CDC and the State of New Jersey were involved also.  And,

there was considerable debate within and between the involved agencies

regarding what the appropriate radon level and associated risk should

be.  The original recommendation from EPA was to reduce radon progeny to

less than 0.02 WLM (based on miner study data).  Working Levels were

more difficult to measure than radon itself so 4 pCi/l became the

guidance level for remediation there, in Florida (phosphate mine debris)

and later on at a national level following the discovery and remediation

of the Watras house in Pennsylvania.



Gerald Nicholls

NJ Department of Environmental Protection

609-633-7964



>>> <RuthWeiner@AOL.COM> 02/03/04 10:07AM >>>

It would be intersting to make a compilation of cases like this one,

and the brief history of the EPA radon standard, to show how much the

policies that supposedly protect public health are the result of some

individual decisions that have nothing to do with public health at all.



ruth

ruthweiner@aol.com 







>In the Montclair, NJ situation, the source of the contamination was 

>uranium tailings from which US Radium had extracted some radium.  The



>residual materials were dumped in the local land fill, an abondoned 

>brownstone quarry, along with all the other local trash which included



>the ash from the coal fires used for local heating at the time.  Based



>on my sampling of this site using extensive boreholes, I believe that



>most of the contamination was due not to uranium, but to the

propagation 

>of radon gas throughout the waste matrix through the porous ash.  EPA



>was not interested in this opinion nor was the contractor who was 

>particularly interested in the prospective work of remediation of this



>danger.  My suggestion of providing a non-porous clay filled trench 

>around the fill site was not interesting to anybody.  EPA would not 

>consider using the latest solid state detectors by which the radium 

>could be differentiated from radon because "it was not in our 

>contract."  As a result, peoples lives were destroyed, homes were 

>demolished and vast sums were used to move innocuous materials to

Utah.  

>I remain disgusted with this project.  I feel bad to this day for the



>people I have hurt whose tears I have seen.

>

>John Andrews

>Knoxville, Tennessee

>

>************************************************************************

>You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

>unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

>text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the

e-mail,

>with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

>http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/ 

>

>





-- 

Ruth F. Weiner

ruthweiner@aol.com 

505-856-5011

(o)505-284-8406



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/ 





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/