RadSafe Archive Mail Index February, 2004

• Thread Index
• [RadSafe Home]
• [RadSafe Archives Search & Browse]

Listing format is the following:

• Subject (# of follow-ups) From
  

• Help with Siemens EPD 1-D Dosimeter (1) Chris
  
• Re: Help with Siemens EPD 1-D Dosimeter (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Contaminants in Rb-86? (1) David Hornsey
  
• RE: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• 28 Days Later (2) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Contaminants in Rb-86? (0) John Jacobus
  
• UFO Reports (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• RE: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays (1) RuthWeiner
  
• asbury park press letter - tfp is bogus (0) Norm Cohen
  
• Norwegian radiation authorities issue li (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: 28 Days Later (0) Doug Aitken
  
• RE: Contaminants in Rb-86? (0) Danny K McClung
  
• RE: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays (0) John Jacobus
  
• Widow Maker (3) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Widow Maker (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays (2) Tom Mohaupt
  
• Re: Widow Maker (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• Re: Widow Maker (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Widow Maker (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Widow Maker (0) William V Lipton
  
• gamma ray cascades (1) Tom Hazlett
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Widow Maker (1) John Jacobus
  
• 14th Int. Conf. On Solid State Dosimetry (0) Mike Bohan
  
• CDC Announcement (0) Susan McElrath
  
• AW: Widow Maker (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Norwegian radiation authorities issu (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: UFO Reports (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: gamma ray cascades (1) John R Johnson
  
• AW: Widow Maker (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (0) John Andrews
  
• AW: Secret shipment at Y-12 (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: gamma ray cascades (1) Frank Helk
  
• Re: AW: UFO Reports (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Medical Event (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays (0) Raymond A Hoover
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (1) RuthWeiner
  
• Investigative Project (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• [osint] Re: AW: UFO Reports (0) Jim Roberts
  
• mrad readings (1) KOSKOKD
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (2) LancerGT
  
• Applied modeling and computations in nuc (0) Thomas M. Semkow
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (0) Gerald Nicholls
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (0) William V Lipton
  
• AW: UFO Reports (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• Re: mrad readings (0) Eli Port
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (0) RuthWeiner
  
• On-Line Registration OPEN for the 23rd A (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: Sausages and Environmental Standards (0) jjcohen
  
• HPS IRC Poster Session; Abstract Submitt (0) james.g.barnes
  
• Re: 700 cancer cases caused by X-rays... (0) John Andrews
  
• Safe use of security x-ray machines (0) Abu-Jarad, Falah A
  
• blackout report (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: blackout report (0) John Jacobus
  
• Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: e (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Tracor Northern MCA...help! (0) Carl Willis
  
• CDV-700 (1) Stephen Stasolla
  
• Radiological Control Technician Training (0) Frank Scarano II
  
• RE: Help with Siemens EPD 1-D Dosimeter (0) Chris
  
• Fallen Flags and Merged Flags (0) Larry Boing
  
• RE: CDV-700 (0) Chris
  
• RE: Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-ray (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: CDV-700 (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Electromagnetic fields, radiation and a (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• RE: gamma ray cascades (0) Frank Helk
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (2) Paul_Prichard
  
• Radiological Control and Dosimetry Techn (0) Dave Biela
  
• Fetal dose standard - comments invited (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Electromagnetic fields, radiation and a (0) Zack Clayton
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (1) HP Dean
  
• RE: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (0) Neil, David M
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (1) Doug Aitken
  
• RE : blackout report (0) Jean-Francois, Stephane
  
• RE: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (0) Carl Speer
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation, c (1) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Certification review study group (0) Eli Port
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation, c (0) maury
  
• RE: UNSCEAR distorts scientific info? (1) yuan-chi luan
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (1) Frank Helk
  
• re : TN- 17xx MCA and a Computer (0) Pete_Bailey
  
• CDV-700 and Computer (1) Pete_Bailey
  
• Re: UNSCEAR distorts scientific info? (0) patricia lewis
  
• Re: Electromagnetic fields, radiation an (0) John Jacobus
  
• Postal Regulations and RAM Shipping (0) Joey Michael
  
• Ramsar, Iran, dose rates found on anothe (0) John Andrews
  
• UPCOMING WEBCAST: Medical Response to Nu (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Radiation Protection Forum - come along (0) Mark Ramsay
  
• Article: Clean Up the Neighborhood, But (0) John Jacobus
  
• Article: Radiation in Water Stumps Exper (1) John Jacobus
  
• PET study for 30 wk pregnancy (1) JGarrett
  
• workers at the Energy Department's gaseo (0) Charly Frey
  
• Re: PET study for 30 wk pregnancy (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Article: Radiation in Water Stumps E (2) Barry E. Muller
  
• (no subject) (1) Bernard L. Cohen
  
• Re: Article: Radiation in Water Stumps E (0) Ted de Castro
  
• Re: PET study for 30 wk pregnancy (1) JGarrett
  
• Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Charly Frey
  
• Re: (no subject) (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: PET study for 30 wk pregnancy (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• no diagrams of American NPPs in caves in (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Follow up question (1) Ned Naylor
  
• AW: Follow up question (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: (no subject) (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (2) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Charly Frey
  
• Re: AW: Follow up question (0) JGinniver
  
• AW: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Thomas J Vandermey
  
• AW: Article: Radiation in Water Stumps E (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Howard Long
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Howard Long
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) LNMolino
  
• Re: AW: Article: Radiation in Water Stum (2) Bernard L. Cohen
  
• Film Festival/Nuclear Legacy (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: PET study for 30 wk pregnancy (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) LancerGT
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) garyi
  
• Re: Film Festival/Nuclear Legacy (0) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Gamma surveys (in-situ) (1) Jay Beckel
  
• RE: Authorized Limit(s) for Annual Dose (0) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (4) jjcohen
  
• AW: AW: Article: Radiation in Water Stum (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Article: Radiation in Water Stumps E (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) RuthWeiner
  
• AW: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• The Detective, by Ortec (0) BAILHA
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (1) Raymond A Hoover
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Vernig, Peter G.
  
• Re: Film Festival/Nuclear Legacy (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (2) HP Dean
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Phil Rutherford
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) BLHamrick
  
• RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (1) Peter Thomas
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Frank Helk
  
• Re: Gamma surveys (in-situ) (0) Frank Helk
  
• RE: Gamma surveys (in-situ) (0) Ed Waller
  
• RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Lost sealed sources in NJ (0) Wesley
  
• RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Midyear talk (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Frank Helk
  
• Re: LSC efficiencies (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Re: Lost sealed sources in NJ (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) HP Dean
  
• Radioactive material reported missing fr (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Counter Terrorism Operations Support at (1) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Radiation Detection Climbing Priority Li (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• Hot Lab doors (0) larry ratliff
  
• RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Jim Blute
  
• RE: Radiation Detection Climbing Priorit (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (2) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• AWARD WINNING NOTIFICATION (0) LOTTOINTPRO1
  
• AW: Midyear talk (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: Midyear talk (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (2) jjcohen
  
• Origin of the 4 mrem (0) Peter Collopy, CIH, CHP
  
• RE: Midyear talk (2) Mercado, Don
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) Jaro
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (1) BLHamrick
  
• AW: Midyear talk (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Midyear talk (0) John R Johnson
  
• Question about RTG sources and xxBe sour (0) Rick Haaker
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) LNMolino
  
• Re: Counter Terrorism Operations Support (0) HP Dean
  
• RE: Midyear talk (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) Steven Dapra
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (1) LNMolino
  
• Apparent Illegal Shipment (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (1) William V Lipton
  
• Re: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• nuclear weapons (1) Sandra
  
• Re: Midyear talk (1) RuthWeiner
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: Midyear talk (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• RE: Apparent Illegal Shipment (2) John R Johnson
  
• RE: Apparent Illegal Shipment (0) Larry Boing
  
• HPS "GUIDANCE FOR PROTECTIVE ACTIONS FOL (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: nuclear weapons (1) Mark Ramsay
  
• RE: Midyear talk (0) John R Johnson
  
• Re: Apparent Illegal Shipment (1) William V Lipton
  
• Electrohypersensitivity ( EHS ), cats, U (0) Bjorn Cedervall
  
• Re: nuclear weapons (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: Apparent Illegal Shipment (0) William V Lipton
  
• RE: Apparent Illegal Shipment (0) Marty.Bourquin
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) jjcohen
  
• NORM shipments was Apparent Illegal Shi (0) Scott, Arthur (MOL)
  
• RE: Midyear talk (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Soil sampling for H-3, C-14 and S-35 (1) John Jacobus
  
• New version of BiokmodWeb (0) guillerm
  
• Senator Reid and Yucca Mountain Hazards (1) HP Dean
  
• RE: Apparent Illegal Shipment (1) Rick Orthen
  
• Re: Apparent Illegal Shipment (1) Syd Levine \(AnaLog\)
  
• RE: Al-Qaida may have nuclear weapons (0) David Whitfill
  
• Canadian experiment with buried waste gl (0) Bernard L. Cohen
  
• AW: Soil sampling for H-3, C-14 and S-35 (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: AW: Soil sampling for H-3, C-14 and (0) John Jacobus
  
• AW: nuclear weapons (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• 15 v. 25? EPA does not use millirems und (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) RadSafeInst
  
• Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year? (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Apparent Illegal Shipment (0) BLHamrick
  
• Natural radioactivty waste in ground wat (1) Dr. Khalid Aleissa
  
• AW: Natural radioactivty waste in ground (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: 15 v. 25? EPA does not use millirems (1) BLHamrick
  
• Re: 15 v. 25? EPA does not use millirems (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: 15 v. 25? EPA does not use millirems (0) BLHamrick
  
• Re: Apparent Illegal Shipment (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• RE: Apparent Illegal Shipment (0) Rick Orthen
  
• RE: 15 v. 25? EPA does not use millirems (0) Morgan, Ben
  
• RE: Senator Reid and Yucca Mountain Haza (0) Rick Orthen
  
• High Radioactivity and Low Security (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• Re: 15 v. 25? EPA does not use millirems (0) BLHamrick
  
• Risk-Based Standards are BOGUS (0) Otto G. Raabe
  
• Re: HPS "GUIDANCE FOR PROTECTIVE ACTIONS (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: Canadian experiment with buried wast (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• " new reactor will make certain Australi (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• [Fwd: RE: Apparent Illegal Shipment - Fo (0) William V Lipton
  
• Re: " new reactor will make certain Aust (0) John Jacobus
  
• NRC Study Says Storage Facility Adequate (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Nuclear Insecurity (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• President Bush's New Plan to Stop Prolif (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• School test kits (1) Vicki Uchida
  
• RE: " new reactor will make certain Aust (1) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• Re: Nuclear Insecurity (0) Sandy Perle
  
• RE: " new reactor will make certain Aust (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Radioisotope Efficiencies (0) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• RE: " new reactor will make certain Aust (0) Jaro
  
• Moved web address (0) Dimiter Popoff
  
• Cross contamination - airborne radioacti (1) Goff, Tom
  
• Re: School test kits (0) xtofree
  
• RE: Cross contamination - airborne radio (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Radioisotope Efficiencies (1) JDNUKE52
  
• Re: Radioisotope Efficiencies (1) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Article: Radiation-induced heart diseas (0) John Jacobus
  
• China to boost nuclear power as demand s (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Doses to fetus / P-32 (0) mark.ramsay
  
• [Fwd: Can People Go to Mars?] (1) Barry E. Muller
  
• NRC Urges Better Monitoring Of Stored Ar (1) Gerry Blackwood
  
• RE: Doses to fetus / P-32 (0) Flanigan, Floyd
  
• Re: Can People Go to Mars?] (0) HP Dean
  
• Leader in radiation monitoring dies (0) Nielsen, Erik
  
• For those interested in the US space pro (0) John Jacobus
  
• Attacking Augusta? (0) Sandy Perle
  
• AW: Cross contamination - airborne radio (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: Can People Go to Mars?] (0) Taylor, Douglas
  
• DOE and commercial landfill proximity (0) NiagaraNet
  
• Siemens Dosimeter Battery (0) Chris
  
• Re: NRC Urges Better Monitoring Of Store (0) William V Lipton
  
• "Domestic WMD Incident Management Legal (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• [Fwd: Can People Go to Mars?] (0) Ansari, Armin
  
• Re: Radioisotope Efficiencies (1) Joel Baumbaugh
  
• Re: Radioisotope Efficiencies (1) William V Lipton
  
• Russia's Mountain of WMD (0) Gerry Blackwood
  
• HELP (0) COLIN SHAND
  
• RE: Radioisotope Efficiencies (0) Stabin, Michael
  
• Ideas on Eliminating Np as a Contaminant (0) Anagnostopoulos, Harry W.
  
• AW: Radioisotope Efficiencies (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• NASA and Air Force Radiation Safety (1) Phil Rutherford
  
• Re: NASA and Air Force Radiation Safety (0) Doug Aitken
  
• Article: MOX plant will open as schedule (0) Bruce Bugg
  
• Important article even if not radiation (0) John Jacobus
  
• RE: Important article even if not radiat (1) Stabin, Michael
  
• Virus Found in message "hello" (0) Deborah J Saunders
  
• Would you hire this HP/CHP?? (0) Mcgrathhoffman
  
• Radiation Training/Meeting, Bethesda, MD (0) TedJ713
  
• RE: Would you hire this HP/CHP?? (0) Ed Waller
  
• CHMM / ASSE Annual Conference (0) William V Lipton
  
• Lack of Safety Is Charged in Nuclear Sit (0) Sandy Perle
  
• Re: AW: Radioisotope Efficiencies (1) Joel T. Baumbaugh
  
• DAC for plutonium 239 (1) Tom
  
• RE: DAC for plutonium 239 (1) Poston, Jay (John) (PEA)
  
• RE: DAC for plutonium 239 (1) Sun, Lin-Shen
  
• Re: DAC for plutonium 239 (0) Tom
  
• AW: AW: Radioisotope Efficiencies (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• AW: Important article even if not radiat (1) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: DAC for plutonium 239 (0) John R Johnson
  
• Yucca Mtn. and Sen. Reid In the News aga (0) HP Dean
  
• Re: AW: Important article even if not ra (0) John Jacobus
  
• Feedback - German lack sufficient protec (0) Jose Julio Rozental
  
• Article: Source of Tainted Md. Water Sti (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: DAC for plutonium 239 (0) William V Lipton
  
• Radon in Finland: concentrations in buil (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• April 2004 Health Physics Journal TOC (0) BABusby
  
• When placebos do harm (1) Susan L Gawarecki
  
• Re: When placebos do harm (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: DAC for plutonium 239 (0) Gv1
  
• 40CFR190 Compliance (1) Glander, Lori
  
• Re: 40CFR190 Compliance (0) William V Lipton
  
• Nuclear Plant Inspection Rules Eased (0) Sandy Perle
  
• IAEA Article: The Promise of Undergroun (1) John Jacobus
  
• Shipping Regulations Effective Today (1) Roy A. Parker
  
• Document request (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• " NRC CAN LICENSE AWAY-FROM-REACTOR SPEN (0) Franta, Jaroslav
  
• RE: IAEA Article: The Promise of Underg (0) Rick Orthen
  
• Roger Caldwell Papers on Web (0) Strom, Daniel J
  
• manual for Oxford Scientifc Products - P (1) JGinniver
  
• AW: manual for Oxford Scientifc Products (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• PWR Fuel Damage (2) HACare
  
• RE: nuclear weapons (1) Mudek, Mario D.
  
• Re: manual for Oxford Scientific Product (0) Peter Swann
  
• AW: PWR Fuel Damage (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• Re: Shipping Regulations Effective Today (0) William V Lipton
  
• PWR Fuel Damage (0) Jenkins, Ken A.
  
• AW: PWR Fuel Damage (0) Franz Schoenhofer
  
• RE: nuclear weapons (0) John Jacobus
  
• Help! EGS CODE SYSTEM SLAC REPORT-265 (0) kongchaocheng
  
• UNH Laser Safety Program (0) David Gillum
  
• UK COMARE 8th Report: A review of pregna (0) Fred Dawson
  
• Re: PWR Fuel Damage (0) JGinniver
  
• Re: nuclear weapons (0) NSSIHOU
  
• Re: NOW GOT manual for Oxford Scientific (0) JGinniver
  
• RE: Shipping Regulations Effective Today (1) Nardi, A. Joseph
  
• job posting for D&D tech or field proces (0) Debby Shonka
  
• Re: IAEA Article: The Promise of Underg (0) EMCTGA
  
• It pays to be Anti-Nuke (0) HP Dean
  
• Re: Shipping Regulations Effective Today (0) Roy A. Parker
  
• RE: It pays to be Anti-Nuke (0) Strickert, Rick
  
• Another document request (1) Jim Hardeman
  
• subject (0) Justin Houser
  
• Re: Another document request (0) maury
  
• Man might get 18 months in prison for X- (1) Edward Soudentas
  
• Re: Roger Caldwell Papers on Web (0) Thomas E. Potter
  
• Re: It pays to be Anti-Nuke (0) Bradt, Clayton
  
• Re: Man might get 18 months in prison fo (1) HP Dean
  
• Big fine for X-ray equipment developers. (0) John Andrews
  
• Re: Man might get 18 months in prison fo (0) John Jacobus
  
• Exit Signs Recycling (0) james.g.barnes
  
• "The Top Ten Reasons To Feel Good About (0) William V Lipton
  
• transport of radioactive animals (0) Catherine Perham
  
• ANSI N545-1975 standard (0) Auroba.L.Al-Samaraee
  
• Re: "The Top Ten Reasons To Feel Good Ab (0) Jim Hardeman
  
• Cs 137 10 microcurie source buttons (for (0) TedJ713
  
• Hormesis in the news (1) Steven Dapra
  
• Yucca Mountain Oversight Costs (0) HP Dean
  
• RE: Tiny doses of some toxins may make b (0) yuan-chi luan
  
• Re: Hormesis in the news (0) John Jacobus
  
• Re: the health of science - and applicat (0) luan yuan-chi
  
• Re: IAEA Article: The Promise of Underg (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Re: It pays to be Anti-Nuke (0) RuthWeiner
  
• Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It's D (1) John Jacobus
  
• Re: 'Sound Science'? Bush closer than b (0) Howard Long
  
• Article: Beware 'Sound Science.' It's D (0) Steven Dapra