[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year?

To: "'HP Dean'" <RadConDean@comcast.net>, "'William V Lipton'" <liptonw@DTEENERGY.COM>,"'jjcohen'" <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>
Subject: RE: 15 or 25 mrem per year?
From: "Rick Orthen" <rorthen@cecinc.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:34:11 -0500
Cc: "'Redmond, Randy $RXQ$'" <redmondrr@Y12.doe.gov>, radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <002b01c3f10f$04dc0f40$6401a8c0@homeboy1>
Organization: CEC, Inc.
Reply-To: "Rick Orthen" <rorthen@cecinc.com>
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.Vanderbilt.Edu

Of course the potential positive AND negative synergistic effects

occurring when the rad and non-rad benefits/insults are combined have

been considered when establishing total risk.



Rick Orthen



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

References:
- Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year?
  - From: "HP Dean" <RadConDean@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Gamma surveys (in-situ)
Next by Date: Lost sealed sources in NJ
Prev by thread: Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year?
Next by thread: Re: 15 or 25 mrem per year?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread