RE: letter to the editor

["Kolb, William (WKOLB)" <WKOLB@arinc.com>]

Jerry,

 

Theo Gray is quite aware of homesis and the swirling controversy. As soon as

you are able to tell Revigator owners how many glasses a day they need to

drink for maximum health benefit, we'd all like to know. One difficulty is

discriminating between what "may" be beneficial from what "is" beneficial.

Another question is whether radiation from drinking radon water is

qualitatively different from breathing radon or relaxing in a radon spa.

 

Inquiring minds want to know.

 

bill

WM Kolb

ARINC Inc.

 



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu] On Behalf Of jjcohen

Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 2:03 PM

To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Fw: letter to the editor





In response to a recently published article on Radon in Popular Science, the

following letter to the editor was sent:

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: jjcohen <mailto:jjcohen@prodigy.net>  

To: letters@popsci.com <mailto:letters@popsci.com>  

Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 3:59 PM

Subject: letter to the editor



Re: Theodore Gray, "For that Healthy Glow, Drink Radiation" pg. 28, August,

2004 issue          of  Popular Science



Healthy Radiation



It is apparently inconceivable to Gray that ingesting a radioactive

substance might actually improve one's health. In fact, it could! The

effects of radiation exposure are largely dependent upon the dosage

received. Certainly at sufficiently high dose, radiation can be deadly.

However, there is a growing body of evidence that at certain low, but above

background levels of exposure, it can be beneficial in nature. Those who

drink Radon Water, or visit Radium Spas may not be so crazy after all. As is

the case with other "harmful" agents, radioactivity follows the

long-standing guidance that "the dose makes the poison".



Jerry Cohen