[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuclear Waste,Science, & Politics: Regaining Virginity?
- To: RuthWeiner@aol.com, joseroze@netvision.net.il, michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu, jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET, vargo@physicist.net, crispy_bird@YAHOO.COM, franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
- Subject: Re: Nuclear Waste,Science, & Politics: Regaining Virginity?
- From: BLHamrick@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:40:49 EDT
In a message dated 10/30/2004 3:12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time,
RuthWeiner@AOL.COM writes:
You know, if "the public" is not well informed, it's either deliberate
ignorance on "the public's" part or a complete lack of interest. Reams of
material on radioactivity, radioactive waste, etc., is all over the internet, much
of it from universities. The information is readily available to anyone who
wants it. I just don't buy the "poorly informed" argument anymore. you can
lead a horse to water....
I know the resources exist for the public, but government agencies have a
serious problem with the press that, if corrected, could have a positive impact
on the situation. The California Department of Health Services declined
repeatedly to respond to grossly inaccurate articles in the LA Times about Ward
Valley, about risks from decommissioning activities, and numerous other
similar topics. If it's right there in the major newspapers, and the agencies sit
back and just hope it will go away, they are failing their responsiblity to
the public and courting the cult of ignorance.
Barbara