[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Activity and Dose Analogies





I've used the light bulb analogy - not perfect but gets a rough idea

across:



Activity = bulb wattage

Exposure = light emitted from bulb

Dose = light that falls onto a person



So a bare 100W bulb left on in the basement provides exposure, but no dose

if no one is down there.  Dose/light gets greater closer to the bulb.  60 W

bulb provides less dose at same location.  Etc.



Haven't yet carried it through to distinguish dose and dose equivalent.

Any ideas?



Happy New Year to all!



_____________________________



Joseph M. Greco, CHP

Radiation/Laser Safety Officer

Eastman Kodak Company

Rochester NY 14652-6261

voice:  585-588-3324

fax:       585-588-0825

email:   joseph.greco@kodak.com

motto:  "illegitimi non carborundum"





                                                                                                                 

                      "Jim Blute"                                                                                

                      <jblute@NITON.com>             To:      "Stabin, Michael"                                  

                      Sent by:                       <michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu>                           

                      owner-radsafe@list.van         cc:      <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>                      

                      derbilt.edu                    Subject: RE: Activity and Dose Analogies                    

                                                                                                                 

                                                                                                                 

                      12/29/2004 09:06 AM                                                                        

                      Please respond to "Jim                                                                     

                      Blute"                                                                                     

                                                                                                                 

                                                                                                                 









Mike,



I like this.  I have used guns and bullets as an analogy often for the same

purpose and have often received comments that this might be too harsh and

scary an analogy.  I must admit I agree.  The boxer is still a bit violent

but less associated with death than a gun.  Yet still something everyone is

familiar with.



I am sure there must be better than that still.  Something less violent but

still physically comparable.



Thanks for the post Mike.



Any other good analogies out there?



-----Original Message-----

From: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

[mailto:owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu]On Behalf Of Stabin, Michael

Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2004 6:52 AM

To: radsafe

Subject: BBC analogies







This showed up in a technical report I was reading. No reference was

given. I just thought it was interesting.



The British Broadcasting Company (BBC) has provided an illustrative

boxing analogy to contrast what is intended by the three international

radiation measures.  It depicts, for the public, the qualitative

differences between Bq, Gy and Sv as:



Bq: " a measure of how many punches are thrown without regard to whether

they are roundhouses, hooks, jabs, or even if they connect at all."



Gy: "a unit that measures whether the punch is a strong uppercut or just

a little jab. However, the gray wouldn't show the cumulative effect of

something like 100 jabs to the exact same spot on the cheekbone versus

one hard punch to the solar plexus"



Sv: "useful in determining the likelihood that (the boxer) might suffer

some long-term damage as a result of this pummeling." "In short, a Sv is

the most useful but complicated and subjective unit for measuring

radiation effects on people."





Mike





Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP

Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences

Vanderbilt University

1161 21st Avenue South

Nashville, TN 37232-2675

Phone (615) 343-0068

Fax   (615) 322-3764

Pager (615) 835-5153

e-mail     michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu

internet   www.doseinfo-radar.com





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To

unsubscribe, send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the

text "unsubscribe radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at

http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/