[ RadSafe ] Re: Nukes are Green

[John Jacobus]

If you relie only on your own senses, what is the use
of having scientists to do studies?  When you went to
college and studies science and engineering, did you
accept everything you were taught?  

My point is that at some point you either you do or do
not believe experts.  If you do not believe in global
warming or the safety of nuclear power, what is your
criteria?  If environmentalist do or do not believe in
global warming or nuclear power, what do you think
their criteria are?  

If there is a perponderance of evidence that global
warming a real pheonenom or that nuclear power is
safe, is that satisfactory?

--- Dimiter Popoff <didi at tgi-sci.com> wrote:
> > ... trust their work?  If not, why not?
> 
> Because of the weather.... :-) 
> 
> Do you have a particular study in mind which I
> should trust?
> 
> Or do you trust the media who tell you there is a
> number
> of studies which are to be trusted?
> 
> I personally tend to trust my own senses...
> (and the thermometer I have outside).
> 
> > If nuclear engineers and regulatory agencies say
> > nuclear power is safe, do you believe them?  If
> not,
> > why not?
> 
> Oh it obviously is safe enough, has done a good job
> for decades
> now. If humans misuse it is their fault, not of the
> technology.
> Kitchen knives can be a deadly weapon, why not take
> into
> preventive custody everyone who posesses one.
> 
> Dimiter
> 
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------
> Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic
> Instruments
> 
> http://www.tgi-sci.com
>
------------------------------------------------------
>   
>   
> > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:15:52 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Re: Nukes are Green
> > To: Dimiter Popoff <didi at tgi-sci.com>, Jerry Cohen
> <jjcohen at prodigy.net>,
> >   radsafe at radlab.nl
> > 
> > I guess the question is if scientist trained in
> > climatology and geophysics believe it is
> occurring, do
> > you trust their work?  If not, why not?
> > 
> > If nuclear engineers and regulatory agencies say
> > nuclear power is safe, do you believe them?  If
> not,
> > why not?
> > 
> > --- Dimiter Popoff <didi at tgi-sci.com> wrote:
> > > We have come to a point where the vast
> disagreement
> > > between reality and its
> > > media presentation is unlikely to be overcome
> > > without a major crisis.
> > > "Global warming" has been repeated so many times
> > > that there is
> > > barely a soul who would question it, no matter
> what
> > > we see when
> > > we look through the window (looks more like a
> coming
> > > ice age to me).
> > > Nuclear has been a swear word for decades, just
> > > watch them turn it
> > > within less than a month or two if they really
> want
> > > to (whoever 
> > > are those /is that in control of the media, and
> > > please save me 
> > > the talk of having free speech etc.).
> > > 
> > > Of course I am against any sort of lies, too.
> The
> > > real question is
> > > whether there is anything we can do about it, I
> wish
> > > I had
> > > a solution to offer...
> > > 
> > > Dimiter
> > > 
> > > . . .
> > 
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> > "Embarrassed, obscure and feeble sentences are
> generally, if not always, the result of embarrasse
> > Hugh Blair, 1783
> > 
> > -- John
> > John Jacobus, MS
> > Certified Health Physicist
> > e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com
> 
> 

+++++++++++++++++++
"Embarrassed, obscure and feeble sentences are generally, if not always, the result of embarrassed, obscure and feeble thought."
Hugh Blair, 1783

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. 
http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/