[ RadSafe ] James Salsman, the radiation protection professional

[Syd H. Levine]

James:

I would never suggest James should go away.  I am not a moderator here, and 
it is not my place to make such pronouncements.  And what you want to talk 
about is certainly on-topic here.  What I have a bit of difficulty 
understanding is why James wants to hang around this group where his 
position has very little support.  Kinda reminds me of the Niagra Net chap 
who seemed to take comfort in opposition here ("if those evil industrial HPs 
hate me, I must be doing something right" kind of logic).  I suppose this is 
a good way to sharpen your pseudo scientific arguments and to further master 
the specialized lingo to better perfect the scientific masquerade.  Has the 
expert opinions given here ever given you even a moment's doubt, James? 
Gathered here are the worlds leading experts (I do not include my self in 
those ranks) on radiation health physics and safety.  Does it not trouble 
you at all that they keep shooting you down?

Syd H. Levine
AnaLog Services, Inc.
Phone:  270-276-5671
Telefax:  270-276-5588
E-mail:  analog at logwell.com
URL:  www.logwell.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Salsman" <james at bovik.org>
To: <radsafe at radlab.nl>; <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] James Salsman, the radiation protection 
professional


> Franz,
>
> I take it that you were unable to convince the EU to charge me
> with criminal eugenics for my opposition to teratogenic sperm?
>
>> James Salsman has to my knowledge never given any information about
>> himself, his profession or his affiliation.
>
> I did, Wednesday, in reply to your question, directly to you as
> well as the list:
>   http://radlab.nl/pipermail/radsafe/2005-April/001129.html
>
>> His homepage at www.bovik.org contains links to information on wind 
>> energy
>
> As do my posts to this list.
>
> > He cites Britt Salbu ... completely wrong.
>
> In what way?  Did he and his colleagues not detect uranyl ion in an
> enclosed uranium munitions burn as reported in their paper last October?
>
>> As mentioned by another RADSAFEr, uranyl nitrate will decompose at 
>> elevated
>> temperature - so how should it form at even higher temperatures? I know
>> - and a lot of other RADSAFErs should know, that transport of uranyl
>> nitrate is highly restricted, simply because of the possibility to
>> decompose and even sustain and enhance fire. I know of a European
>> institute which wanted to get rid of a large amount of uranyl nitrate
>> and another US-one which was very eager to receive it - and the problem
>> was, that transport containers had to be used with one of the highest
>> safety level, which made transport extremely expensive.
>
> I am glad that I have learned this.  It implicates the UO3 oxide
> species, not uranyl nitrate.  Were it not for my correspondence on
> this list, I might never have understood that.
>
>> James, it seems that your comments on RADSAFE are not well received,
>> my opinion only being one among so many.
>
> You are welcome to keep your promises, made and broken both last year
> and this week, to refrain from replying to me.
>
> Sincerely,
> James Salsman
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list
> radsafe at radlab.nl
>
> For information on how to subscribe/unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
> http://radlab.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
>