[ RadSafe ] criminal action: WG: Casper Sun

[Dietmar Muehlboeck]

Well,
The only criminal offense I can see here was conducted by Mr. Schoenhofer,
since according to Austrian civilian code one is not entitled to make third
party, private emails public. Mr. Schoenhofer - see here: § 77 UrhG.

And since Mr. Schoenhofer mentioned to be disturbed by mailers with a TLD
.mil - The group shall have in mind that "MR iR" means "Ministerialrat in
Ruhe" - iow: a mid-level retired public servant. Fine, but retired in
Austria means not the same as in the US or UK, where one can retire from
service at an age when she/he is still able to be productive. In Austria it
means that one is quite old, somewhere around 65yrs. So I guess Mr.
Schoenhofer is an old man abusing this list for compensating years of
frustration in Austrian public service - and believe me, this can be
frustrating. So now you might establish an idea on Mr. Schoenhofer's
mindset.

Cheers!
dm+


> RADSAFErs,
>
> Since the change on RADSAFE obviously some persons on RADSAFE believe
> that they can behave as if the list was their own. I am flamed in an
> incredible way and even accused of having “provoked” the flamers. The
> flamer used words which I do not want to reproduce here.
>
> The latest development is, that I just received a flame (with typing
> error), which was sent by somebody using my name on a yahoo account (see
> below). This is not only illegal, but criminal. I noticed that many
> messages proposing my suspension from the list have a “mil” in their
> addresses.  Is RADSAFE developing into these directions?
>
> ...yabbayabbayabba...
>
> Franz Schoenhofer
> PhD, MR iR
> Habicherg. 31/7
> A-1160 Vienna
> AUSTRIA
> phone (international) -43-699-1168-1319
> phone (national) 0699-1168-1319
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> An: franz.schoenhofer at chello.at
> Betreff: Casper Sun
>
> Franz:  I am replying off line as you requested.  Your attack on Casper
> Sun was entirely unwarranted but expected within your limited benavioral
> responses.  Casper is a good, intelligent man and his question could
> have been well answered in general terms explaining assumptions.  You
> have become even more of a disgrace to the on-line community with this
> response.  You should be ashamed, but my guess is that feeling is beyond
> you.  Don Davis
>   _____