[ RadSafe ] " Nuclear workers: low radiation dose linked to small increased r isk of cancer "

[howard long]

We are winning!
Listen to the President tonight, boosting nuclear electrical production even in a talk largely about Iraq. Serendipity. The global warming, world government boosters (BORG) have, unintentionally, made the public aware of the economic need for nuclear power!
 
Howard Long

Sandy Perle <sandyfl at earthlink.net> wrote:
On 28 Jun 2005 at 16:39, Franta, Jaroslav wrote:

> How accurate is this media story about the published study ?
> >From what I've seen of individual country studies (which contributed
> >to this
> global compilation, I believe), the cancer rates of nuclear workers is
> lower than that of the public in general -- although age adjustment &
> other factors need to be factored in.....

Other studies in the US power reactor population show the opposite. 
When the probablilty is shown to be lower than for the general 
public, the term "healthy worker effect" is thrown out. You can't 
win!
-------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614 

Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1902 

E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl at earthlink.net 

Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/ 

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the radsafe mailing list radsafe at radlab.nl

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/