[ RadSafe ] Unidentified Helicopters Nearly Fired UponOver Nuclear Power PlantBy

[Gerry Blackwood]

...ah....I think about 10 kilotons would do it........very...cheap and very easy........

jjcohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net> wrote:Suppose that we are dealing with a sophisticated terrorist whose objective
is to kill a maximum number of people with the minimum expense and effort.
Anything having to do with radiation or nuclear energy would be a poor
choice. Unfortunately, this is not the forum to go unto detail, but there
could be several preferable alternatives ( 9/11 provides one example).
OTOH, if the objective is to panic the maximun number of people it might be
different. However, in such case, all you would need to accomplish the
objective would be the THREAT of exposing people to radioactivity.



----- Original Message -----
From: Gerry Blackwood
To: sandyfl at earthlink.net ; J. Marshall Reber ; Richard L. Hess ; jjcohen
Cc: Rad Safe
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Unidentified Helicopters Nearly Fired UponOver
Nuclear Power PlantBy


"There isn't an issue with any damage to the containment building."

Well we will disagree here since all of this notion is theoretical and
relies on computer modeling...... Shoot the dam thing down I would hate to
find out the computer was wrong.......

Sandy Perle wrote:
On 12 Mar 2005 at 14:02, jjcohen wrote:

> Richard asks an excellent question! Why are we so concerned regarding
> aircraft crashing into nuclear plants? Of coarse we don't want them
> crashing anywhere, but why the special concern with nuclear
> facilities? I realize this concern is a good thing for people in the
> security business, but how does it benefit the rest of us?




"Dante once said that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality."