[ RadSafe ] Overcoming America's nuclear power phobia
Al Tschaeche
antatnsu at adelphia.net
Thu May 12 20:17:08 CEST 2005
Every man/woman has his/her price. The Japanese government pays people
in the immediate vicinity of their proposed nuclear power plants a sum
of money to get them not to oppose the plants. We don't do that in this
country. But our government does pay certain states to accept certain
government facilities and activities so it's not much different. New
Mexico got millions for WIPP. If Nevada would get out of the way of YM,
it would get millions also. So I think "radiophobes are unprincipled
people who would abandon their deep seated beliefs for a few dollars."
Maybe more than just a "few." Am I too cynical?
jjcohen wrote:
>Radiophobia cannot be assuaged by any financial incentive because
>it is irrational to begin with..Since radiophobes believe that any
>radiation exposure leads to a certain and horrible death, how much
>money would it take to compensate them?
>Or, are you suggesting that radiophobes are unprincipled people
>who would abandon their deep seated beliefs for a few dollars?
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
>To: Muckerheide, James <jimm at wpi.edu>; <mbrexchange at list.ans.org>;
><radsafe at radlab.nl>
>Cc: <know_nukes at yahoogroups.com>; <rad-sci-l at wpi.edu>
>Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 6:03 AM
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Overcoming America's nuclear power phobia
>
>
>
>
>>To me, the real test is what happens with a company
>>proposes to build a new nuclear power plant in the
>>U.S. The hypothesis that radiophobia is the problem
>>to the development of new power plants is speculative.
>> I think that this is an economic issue, which can be
>>fixed by giving tax incentives to the power companies.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the radsafe
mailing list