[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: non-ionizing



If the hazard (threat) is significant, AND you can't find a specific
reg to tie it too, one can always rely on the General Duty Clause
of 29CFR.... _regardless_ of the type of threat.  ....... at least I've
always believed that.  Can anyone testify to the contrary?
Regards.......~jess <jmckenzie@cc.weber.edu>