[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tuballoy
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: Tuballoy
- From: COMSTOCK_DANIEL_L@em.lanl.gov
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 07:33:00 MST
- A1-Type: MAIL
- Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 0
- Importance: normal
- Mr-Received: by mta ADPDP2; Relayed; Fri, 11 Feb 1994 07:47:33 -0700 (MST)
- Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 07:47:00 MST
- Priority: normal
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;33747011204991/286354@ADPDP2]
This same question was posed to me awhile back, and I found that there
is apparently a historical difference in the meaning of the term
"tuballoy." In some older materials (1940's through 50's) it was
sometimes used to refer to depleted uranium, and sometime in the early
60's the meaning seems to change to mean natural uranium. (I may be
getting this backwards). Unfortunately I don't have the materials I
saw anymore, which gave very specific definitions of tuballoy and
oralloy - and the percentages given were different in the older and the
newer materials.
I should explain that I'm a librarian and not a health physicist, and
if anyone has definitive word on the above I'd appreciate any
information available so I can document this for future reference.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dan Comstock
Administrative Data Processing Division
University of California
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 "Knowledge is Power"
Business: comstock@lanl.gov -Auntie Mame
Personal: dan@cup.portal.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^